sidesh0wb0b
Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
- Messages
- 5,668
- Reaction score
- 649
Roland 51D with sum3dWhat kind of mill do you have?
Roland 51D with sum3dWhat kind of mill do you have?
that could work, but it would depend on how long the abutments are. bob did mention they were quite long.Do a coping design on those abutments. Move your margins closer to tissue level. Bond to the abuts and rescan/design. You can shorten your bridges height and create shorter, less parallel intaglios.
He can't mill it because the overall length is too long for his burr shank. Not the case if it is split into two shorter parts.But those copings would be the same inside... and if he cannot mill this bridge, he won't be able to mill that either...
i mean you aren't wrong here, but shortening the abutments might not be possible. for example this could be an IOS case and the abutments are out of bob's control. only bob would know, but still adjusting the abutment might not be a great idea.Disagree. Shorten the abuts slightly and increase the taper just a bit.
Find answers, not excuses.
Yeah I get that. I have had just a couple cases where I bust my ass to try to do what he wants only to give in to defeat and tell them it is just not possible for whatever reason and end up doing what is actually possible. Good luck to you.considered that....not the Drs request. he wants the higher strength of the zirc...hence zirc.
ok folks, here is a fun challenge....i have a 3unit anterior bridge over very LONG and skinny abutments. i need to mill this out of a very nice, super trans zirconia, and have it in my hands by end of the day monday.
challenge: the size of the bridge requires a 24mm or more thick puck (of the aforementioned super trans zirc). also, maybe its my inept nature, but with the mill and tools i have, each time i mill or calculate the tool strategies, i end up chipping a margin because the shank of the 1mm tool is just ever so slightly bumping the margin or internal sidewall of one of the abutments.
if you think you can make it happen, and have the necessary tools and zirconia, and get let me know ASAP if you feel comfortable giving it a whirl....contact me now. I am out of time on this one and absolutely need to have it happen. super challenging case and patient is running low on tolerating delays (not my fault i swear lol)
pm me or post a reply. i will be watching...and praying hahaha
here's a couple preview images. the long tip of the margin is the bane of my existence.
trying to avoid shortening the abutments. need as much vertical support as i can get for stability. very compromised case to begin with....i did consider it though, its really just that one extra long spot on the margin thats giving me a headache.Disagree. Shorten the abuts slightly and increase the taper just a bit.
Find answers, not excuses.
they probably do, i really like sum3d. spent a few hours tweaking positioning and rerunning the calc in simulations to see if the strategy came out better. i have it where i "think" it may survive....but im not sure. puck should be here today for me to mill 4x before i throw something hahaha!doesn't sum3d offer lead/lag options in their 5-axis machining module?
Not sure exactly the "depth of rub", but a slight lead/lag adjustment might do the trick without worrying about collisions.
Not sure how much rub you have, cutting parameters, machining strategy used or amount of margin reinforcement but you might try splitting up the toolpath or reversing it. That is, top down instead of bottom up or top down then bottom up. Be aware this may require modifications to feeds and speeds and/or depth/width of cut.
Your distributor should be able to help get you through this case. Any luck there?
BTW, this is a good example of the differences in software. Some CAM software will automatically tilt and collision check....
yeah, and get the usual.....this is why you should be buying CAP tools at $178 each that last half as long as the TD tools i get for a third of the price each. what the f@ck ever! i burned through $2000+ realizing their tools were absolute TRASH. i wont be switching back.It seems like you should contact your reseller and let them know what's going on. It appears that a tool isn't modeled correctly in the software around the protection zones. Maybe they can give you a more accurate model of the tool so it won't bump into the Zirconia.
margin thickness is fine. well above the .4mm i usually run (prob .75mm in most areas)The margin extension should be bulked up and finished down by hand to ensure that you get it milled out properly. Also, looks like to me from this angle that the margins are undercut/overextended.
margin thickness is fine. well above the .4mm i usually run (prob .75mm in most areas)
no undercuts inside either. this are milled titanium abutments made parallel to each other for draw.
yeah, and get the usual.....this is why you should be buying CAP tools at $178 each that last half as long as the TD tools i get for a third of the price each. what the f@ck ever! i burned through $2000+ realizing their tools were absolute TRASH. i wont be switching back.
yeah i should have prob done that, youre correct. didnt think of that. will try that before i try milling.I'm talking about the margin extension. Bump it out to .2 or .25 and you will see what I'm talking about.