LA Ceramics
Active Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 293
- Reaction score
- 63
I tried out the whole AG ceramill system. Scanner was REALLY slow, CAD is exocad (which I'm sure I could get used to- but I still prefer 3shape),the mill is 5 axis wet dry, the furnace was a furnace. I liked it a lot more when I designed in 3shape and just used the CAM and mill, but the system is so cumbersome and clunky. More suited to walking a single unit all the way through, not production work. If I had to get 50 FCZ crowns through that thing in a day I would go crazy. Main reason we didn't go for it was materials cost / limitations and AG selling as a package (not just CAM and mill).
I know your not saying the map 400 is slow,..Ceramill motion 2 cumbersome and clunky
50 fcz in a day,........scan, design, milling too I suppose,.....ok , ..too late JOE,..your already crazy.