JMN
Christian Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 12,205
- Reaction score
- 1,884
Greetings all.
Wondering what you mill owners assume as the number of units you'll get from a puck for material costs purposes.
We used to charge for the metal, but now we do one size pricing even though there is less molars per puck than bicispids or centrals. If you can charge molar prices for premolars why not, right?
Has anyone bothered trying a price model other than more for anterior/less for posterior?
The increased ability to accuratly quote out a situation has certainly been nice, but I also wonder if that isn't hurting the idea that we are artisians producing custom work and helping the idea that we're pushing a button and with rare exception a crown is a crown.
Thoughts?
Wondering what you mill owners assume as the number of units you'll get from a puck for material costs purposes.
We used to charge for the metal, but now we do one size pricing even though there is less molars per puck than bicispids or centrals. If you can charge molar prices for premolars why not, right?
Has anyone bothered trying a price model other than more for anterior/less for posterior?
The increased ability to accuratly quote out a situation has certainly been nice, but I also wonder if that isn't hurting the idea that we are artisians producing custom work and helping the idea that we're pushing a button and with rare exception a crown is a crown.
Thoughts?