cadfan
Well-Known Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 1,524
- Reaction score
- 207
D900 is too expensive for me . 32.000 euros plus 23% tax = 40 k euros . And I have to add 1500 euros every year for the software rent . Too much . I want to add another mill this year , a yenadent D15 . For 40 k I am getting the scanner AND the small mill . In any case , D900 is the only 3shape I would buy , and it is too expensive for my pocket . I haven't seen the blue in action yet , that's why I am curious . I have heard about 7 microns accuracy for the Blue , which is ok for my needs .
My main question is if there is any way of accurate transfer of the occlusion from analog to digital . So far , I can't say I am happy with that , with either of my two scanners . I am doing lots of full arches and FMR , so I need something accurate . GC scanner has failed to do that . Its design won't let it do it . The most accurate way I can think is by scanning the articulator itself . Other than the Zirkonzahn , SmartOptics 885 and ZFX evolution scanners , is there any other scanners out there that can do that ? I saw a plate for medit and Artex articulators . Does it work ?
How is your normal workflow , wax up on situ model transfered to präp model , wax up on the prep model , upper or lower or both at one time. Normally the TMJ must be registered 885 OK ZZ OK the rest i dont think so ( its only for from interest with TMJ data) . Did you have all models in the same arti ( situ , präp antagonists ) and can you change every one against the other and which articulator do you use.Do you always make full jaws at one time or divided first front than side with options to match.