D
DeVreugd
New Member
- Messages
- 224
- Reaction score
- 4
Just sent out this case for Dr. evaluation. I wanted to see how e.max stain & glaze will look in the clinical setting. The Rx called for PFM's which I sent as well. I will post results once I get them !!
Here is the maxillary first molar......
Nice molar! Try to add more translucency using grey and blue stain on 3/4 of molar surface and incisel edges of the molar next time and you'll see a big difference.
Very nice. Did you use a LT ingot? Great idea for convincing Drs. To switch to emax. Thanks for sharing
Thanks, I used a MO1 for this one.
Russ
MO? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought HO and MO are only for the layering technique, not recommended full contour or cut-back technique, that's what LT, HT, and now Impulse are for?
Al,
Hand waxed ! I can hand wax them almost as fast as using my Biofit molds....
Why is that Rob ?
No way, your not pulling my leg are you? I do ALOT of waxing and thats a beautiful wax up for a hand wax or not using an occ mold. Very difficult to hand wax that detail.
When I cut sprues I usually cut them fairly close like you did but if you do a thinner press like veneers leave a little more sprue or you will often get a small crack on the restoration starting at the sprue.
Why is that Rob ?
As far as i was aware, there is no detrimental difference in the composition of the MO material to either LT or HT or even HO.
the reason MO isn't indicated for fc or cut back is because it is deemed to opaque, or so i thought. Other than that, there is no reason not to use it for FC.
Maybe someone knows different.