TomZ
Well-Known Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 804
- Reaction score
- 294
Volume of the lab has influence, but efficacy and marketability are other factors. Dont sell the small operations short, we usually end up refining what is offered out there.
Those numbers seem rather arbitrary. There's a Dr on DT that of three dentures done with SCS had to send two of them back for reset.
I would still like to see a study with some depth to it that quantifies this one way or another. Otherwise its all sales talk and that means squat to me.
i understand, and i hope you didn't take what I'm saying as criticism. I've put in a lot of years at removable pros and so I'm not so enthusiastic about laying down a big wad of cash to do what I already know how to do.I am only conveying what a technician that uses the system said to me a few weeks ago, before that I had never heard of it. I think this is a lively debate we are having but I tend to listen to people that use a system rather than the sales people. This forum with all these opinions can only be good for anybody thinking of purchasing.
Jim
Hi Brian, just got back fro attending a course at LVI and sat next to a bloke from Fairmont MN and he was telling me about this system. He swears by it, he says industry average for reset and retry is about 30%, with the Staub Cranial System his lab is running at 5%. Hope this helps.
Jim
Guys, you need to embrace technology, I'm not saying be the first to buy anything that comes down the line, but look at things in depth ( and very few on this post have put much research in this) and be open to evolving.
Then again, the technology behind calculators is great. But, if you use it as an excuse not to learn math, geometry, algebra, or calculus then it can be a curse. And that is the concern...that a piece of technology might breed a dumber generation of pseudo-technicians' instead of enhancing a generation of super-technicians.
). But no one here can look a set of wax rims and replicate what God gave that patient, instead we put a mid-line where the doc marks and then set the teeth to what we think looks good and functions good on an articulator. I see the benefit in a system that replicates natural positioning. I bet no one here is replicating natural God given tooth positioning within 5% accuracy with there eyes, and bite rims made by docs that only half way know what they are doing.
I get what your saying and yeah we use rulers and all the little tools, but I am still willing to bet that this system is more accurate than what all of us are doing now. Just my opinion and we all know the saying about opinions.
I have been watching this thread for a couple of months now. There is a good debate surrounding this technology. There are a lot of things that are well understood, but, there are some facts that are incorrect. I understand that this is not the place for the representative of a product to interject. However, I would like to invite any individuals that have questions that this environment cannot answer to contact me. My name is Jason Love. I am one of the trainers for the Staub Cranial Technology. Thank You!
Jason Love
Executive Coordinator
800-884-5047
[email protected]
Staub Cranial Home
I offer a free Go to Meeting to explain the entire process, benefits, and answer questions. These meetings can include up to 15 different individuals. A typical meeting takes about 25 minutes to go through all the basic information.
I don't understand what kind of investment you are referring to. We have our entire training process in videos on our website(Staub Cranial Home). We have invested a lot of energy into making our company as transparent as possible. Is there something I am missing?