Sagemax zirconia

R

Ron.Ferland

Member
Full Member
Messages
186
Reaction score
26
Interesting.
 
Last edited:
R

Ron.Ferland

Member
Full Member
Messages
186
Reaction score
26
When a laboratory makes the choice to use the cheapest product available, usually believing that “it’s all the same” they are taking on risk. This FDA warning to Sagemax identifies the risk associated with that product in particular. Is it worth it? Do a laboratory’s customers know that they are taking a risk too? NO. Watch out all the vendors that Sagemax private labels, like Argen. They're in the same boat.
 
Affinity

Affinity

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
6,948
Reaction score
1,062
Sorry but since when does the federal government declare whether a product is "good' or not .. especially based on the filing of paperwork and procedures.. So a different product, of inferior quality, made in china, or wherever else in the world, gets a pass because they file their paperwork properly? I understand the need for testing the zirconia, but correct me if im wrong, the FDA only makes determinations on reports from the company itself.. they dont do their own testing! So what we should be saying is.. Sagemax tests their zirconia to be to the highest standard, but because they didnt document it correctly , the way the Feds deem proper.. then the product and their testing is garbage?

Who declares the quality of a product? The FDA or the consumer?

Im sure SM will be along to clear things up when they get their ducks in a row, But, I use this product and I like it.. and I like that is made in the US.. and I like that its affordable.. Thats enough for me.
 
eyeloveteeth

eyeloveteeth

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,169
Reaction score
275
nothing here is inferring that the product is inferior in anyway. We have used Sagemax products for a very long time with wonderful results.

if you look at the things the FDA is nit picking at, it's all logistic stuff in the background for the most part. To me, it just sounds like they pissed off the wrong auditor and got written up.

Go check out any other manufacturer's audits, there's at least 1 a year from the other big lab companies. What really stuck out this time was that the FDA auditor decided to just go on a rampage.


Seems rigged to me
 
R

Radu

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
6
Same here. We are very satisfied with Sagemax. Fantastic product and consistent results. Don't know what's with FDA but I'm sick of bureaucracy..
 
R

Ron.Ferland

Member
Full Member
Messages
186
Reaction score
26
ly
Sorry but since when does the federal government declare whether a product is "good' or not .. especially based on the filing of paperwork and procedures.. So a different product, of inferior quality, made in china, or wherever else in the world, gets a pass because they file their paperwork properly? I understand the need for testing the zirconia, but correct me if im wrong, the FDA only makes determinations on reports from the company itself.. they dont do their own testing! So what we should be saying is.. Sagemax tests their zirconia to be to the highest standard, but because they didnt document it correctly , the way the Feds deem proper.. then the product and their testing is garbage?

Who declares the quality of a product? The FDA or the consumer?

Im sure SM will be along to clear things up when they get their ducks in a row, But, I use this product and I like it.. and I like that is made in the US.. and I like that its affordable.. Thats enough for me.

The point is you get what you pay for. Sagemax may work well in your hands today, but if there skimping on the basics to keep the FDA happy, what else are they skimping on? You really do have to ask this basic question: How exactly can SM sell their stuff for so little? Especially noting that the materials are made in the USA, with US taxes and high manpower costs. Most of us here are owners of labs. How do we go about selling our products lower than anyone else? 1. Outsource to China, Vietnam, and/or India and the like. 2. Use lower priced raw materials. 3. Employee low cost manpower. 4. Skip protocol to get things out the door as cheap as possible. So again. How do they sell their stuff so cheaply?
 
P

PJR

New Member
Full Member
Messages
25
Reaction score
5
Maybe it doesn't really cost that much to make zirconia? Have you ever made zirconia before?
 
R

Ron.Ferland

Member
Full Member
Messages
186
Reaction score
26
Maybe it doesn't really cost that much to make zirconia? Have you ever made zirconia before?
Before? Before what?

I have not produced a zirconia disc from raw materials. I do run a business though and understand sourcing raw materials for the products I produce. I understand I can save money by cutting corners. This is what is happening with SM, or they are just very unlucky with the FDA.

Frankly, I want to use products from companies that have been around for a while, you know? DePuy Zr implants were good, until they weren't. I can't afford to have no backup when problems arise. JMHO though.
 
NicelyMKV

NicelyMKV

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
3,557
Reaction score
262
Ron, I was buying zenostar for less than Sagemax. You obviously have some tie to Ivoclar so explain how Ivoclar can sell it so cheap?
 
R

Ron.Ferland

Member
Full Member
Messages
186
Reaction score
26
Ron, I was buying zenostar for less than Sagemax. You obviously have some tie to Ivoclar so explain how Ivoclar can sell it so cheap?
How the heck are/were you buying Zenostar for less than Sage? What are you using now?

No tie to ivoclar except I buy their stuff and feel they are the only guys really helping me grow my business. Maybe I'm native, but this means something.
 
Tom Moore

Tom Moore

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
1,642
Reaction score
194
A company with market share and profits will clear this up asap. That is what FDA wants....compliance. The FDA registers products and manufactures and make sure they are keeping the paperwork on their manufacturing they are supposed to keep. I Do find it strange that most labs that do not don't follow the FDA rules have so much to say about this.
 
sidesh0wb0b

sidesh0wb0b

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
5,656
Reaction score
649
folks, did you read the report? as I stated above a few times....these look to be nothing more than procedural items. NOT the zi itself, but filing of paperwork.
and if we are all super honest with each other we know that the government has the best filing system on the planet. they always have everything in proper order and never lose files. or emails, or hard drives....

the simple facts remain, sagemax produces a product that is of nice quality and made in the US. many many many people enjoy and prefer their zirconia. I am willing to bet SM will get everything fixed up to meet the FDA requirements and business will continue as normal.
 
NicelyMKV

NicelyMKV

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
3,557
Reaction score
262
How the heck are/were you buying Zenostar for less than Sage? What are you using now?

No tie to ivoclar except I buy their stuff and feel they are the only guys really helping me grow my business. Maybe I'm native, but this means something.
Hmmmm.... Ivoclar was giving me a great price or Sagemax isn't.... You have me wondering now Ron...lol
 
P

PJR

New Member
Full Member
Messages
25
Reaction score
5
I think both Ivoclar and sagemax have great products. Ivoclars zirconia may be priced higher because they have a bigger marketing campaign. Sagemax doesn't cut corners they just don't market as much. This may be the difference in price
 
Tom Moore

Tom Moore

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
1,642
Reaction score
194
When you deal with people that operate in a paper world a lie on paper will sometimes look better that the truth coming out of your mouth.
 

Similar threads

MrSae
Replies
17
Views
1K
desertfox384
desertfox384
JoeMargolis
Replies
0
Views
508
JoeMargolis
JoeMargolis
B
Replies
4
Views
787
Bowman1989
B
GhostFake
Replies
14
Views
527
Car 54
Car 54
millennium
Replies
48
Views
4K
millennium
millennium
Top Bottom