Jean-Michel BERTIN
Active Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 158
- Reaction score
- 31
Except the price, what is really the différence between the Steinbchler vs medit second édition ? What can you do with the Steinbchler that you can't do with medit ?
Does bigger and heavier decide who is the better technician is?
well you know what they say about a guy with a big scanner right?
yeah they wiegh a lot!!!
well you know what they say about a guy with a big scanner right?
yeah they wiegh a lot!!!
You and Bob are the ones pulling info out from your a55. (Completly guessing and just making up stuff)
Not me. I have data and Industry leaders that disagree with you. Not just making up stuff.
If you can't handle the truth, then don't read my posts.
If you have some solid data/info...then post it up!
You asked about Nobel, I gave you the answer.
The "expert" who started their program has left Tyler. He would NOT accept your 3shape design for a bar.
You are welcome to contact him and ask these questions. Show me the results from proper testing for the 3shape.
You and Bob are NOT qualified to make any statements about a scanner's accuracy. UNDERSTAND?
Um-K?
Now ask yourself... "who is the One that is sounding like hard-headed Disturbed? Me, or you?"
Medit is good. I like it and am keeping some for myself, and proudly selling them.
If you want the best, then it would be the steinbichler. It is over 2x the cost and weighs 4x as much or more.
It is an industrial scanner. No LG commercial projector and regular store bought cameras. Only the best German optics and componants.
Very different products. Not in the same class at all. Like trying to compare an AMG Mercedes to a Hyndai or Kia. Yes, both are cars.
Both are good value for the cost. Just not in the same class.
I need a scanner that will pass testing for Bars and abutments that will satisfy the FDA and ADA.
Scott
Does bigger and heavier decide who is the better technician is?
You don't need to run a bar through metrology software to know if it fits or not. If you want to compare a bar made on a 3Shape to a bar made on another scanner then yes, but that has nothing to do with things fitting.
And you mentioned posting 'solid data' but all you posted was a quote from someone...I wouldn't call that 'solid'. I build scan bar cases regularly on my 3Shape and haven't had a problem.
It s just commercial argument Scott.
I need some Technicals arguments. If you compare to 3shape or dw we can speak about différence of technology and we know that light is better than laser for the accurency. But in this case we spoke about the same technology also just if you can explain me the différence between the 2 scanners. Time of scan is better ? Accurency is the same together as you tell (<5 microns ) also for implant together are good. I have ever done a complete bridge with 9 implants and the result with the medit was perfect. Maybe the software is better than identica ? If you can explain me. Thanks for this information.
How much did it cost?
I like the way you think, John. I'm impressed by the unbelievable amount of knowledge that is in this thread...I'm just trying to figure out how all of this data translates into buying me a nice new boat?
Only the best German optics and componants.
I am a Homo. e in Japan/Korea rofl
I like the way you think, John. I'm impressed by the unbelievable amount of knowledge that is in this thread...I'm just trying to figure out how all of this data translates into buying me a nice new boat?
Take $10 worth of Titanium and turn it into $1000.
Can you understand that?