This video is could be misleading to some, it makes it look so simple. First time a DR does this he will most likely not try it again
Rarely are the implant this parallel and in close proximity. extending the gel with out a frame work of floss or something else is tough in the mouth with out it slumping. The depth of fixtures and the height of the transfer assemblies or temp abutments (dissimilarities) will effect this ease as well
The relief joints to compensate for resin curing dimensional changes is smart however when you sluff off (grind/cut) the o2 inhibited layer of the composite when you are thin cutting the jig the bond between the resin is not there with out a primer. Any divergency to the fixtures when you pull the jig out will lead to separation.
This is one of the reason I like to use PMMA the bond with any pattern resin is super tenacious with out having to use any paint on bonder in the mouth. Pattern resin will flow exceptionally thin to run down thin joints in the mouth making mechanical retention not really needed.
The truth is we have had a great discussion here but what works for some seems backwards for others. There is not just one way to make sure a master model is verified which is why we see so many differences in material and techniques. What is true is that at least over the last 15 years or so this has become the standard of care and the clients do not question the path anymore, they may bitch about the costs associated with it but it really isn't a discussion I am forced to initiate anymore.