Problems milling zirconia inlays/onlays with a Rolland DWX-52dci, chips and more chips

rivfordental

rivfordental

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
it looks like it ripped a chunk out of the zirconia, do you happen to know which tool did this? i would change tools right away. a gouge like that is either a dull, clogged or bent tool. being only in one spot, its definitely a tool clogging issue. the air sprays a tiiiiiiiny amount of moisture as it blows, this traps on the porous tool tip and causes tools to become clogged at the microscopic scale. then, you get big pits and chunks like this. since the moisture in the air varies, it has no frequency pattern and is unpredictable.
Thanks @CoolHandLuke
 
zero_zero

zero_zero

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,303
Reaction score
1,397
Hello @zero_zero could you explain more in detail?
Going slower with cutting you have less chances for chipping, your milling strategies consist of various cycles...one (or more) in particular is pocketing. This is delimited by the margin curve, pocketing is usually geared to deal with a rather simple geometry...if you got something complex like this:
inlay.png
I can cause issues, like chipping, since the tool will not necessarily retract going from one corner to another. By deleting the margin curve, it will force the CAM to mill the "inside" of the inlay with the cycle dedicated to the "outside". You could loose some detail, but in general it works. At least for my CAM setup, YMMV...
 
rivfordental

rivfordental

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Going slower with cutting you have less chances for chipping, your milling strategies consist of various cycles...one (or more) in particular is pocketing. This is delimited by the margin curve, pocketing is usually geared to deal with a rather simple geometry...if you got something complex like this:
View attachment 36401
I can cause issues, like chipping, since the tool will not necessarily retract going from one corner to another. By deleting the margin curve, it will force the CAM to mill the "inside" of the inlay with the cycle dedicated to the "outside". You could loose some detail, but in general it works. At least for my CAM setup, YMMV...
@zero_zero thank you so much, i will try this.
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,095
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
by deleting the margin curve the tools will follow the height of contour instead, when calculating finishing toolpaths.
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,095
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
yes. maybe i'm mansplaining. maybe thats enough out of me lol
 
user name

user name

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,960
Reaction score
1,633
It almost seems a tool is hitting your Zr when its not supposed to. Are you positive the correct thickness blank is entered?
 
JMN

JMN

Christian Member
Full Member
Messages
12,205
Reaction score
1,884
and correct tool length, diameter....
 
JMN

JMN

Christian Member
Full Member
Messages
12,205
Reaction score
1,884
Maybe i am asking a lot, sorry about that, but, i didn't understand this part
if you are using 98 mm pucks they come in different thicknesses so a tall canine and such will fit.
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,095
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
and correct tool length, diameter....
i'm not saying these parts of the cam don't matter, i'm just going to say they matter less in Vertical milling, and much MUCH more in Horizontal milling - for example in Imes 250i.

the correct blank thinkness does matter quite a lot though, because the initial plunge of the tool can prematurely damage it if it plunges too deep too fast. though, if this were the case, rivfordental would be complaining of too many used tools as well as gouges and chips.
 
rivfordental

rivfordental

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
i'm not saying these parts of the cam don't matter, i'm just going to say they matter less in Vertical milling, and much MUCH more in Horizontal milling - for example in Imes 250i.

the correct blank thinkness does matter quite a lot though, because the initial plunge of the tool can prematurely damage it if it plunges too deep too fast. though, if this were the case, rivfordental would be complaining of too many used tools as well as gouges and chips.
Well, we are using discs 98MMx18MM
 
Glenn Kennedy

Glenn Kennedy

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
1,660
Reaction score
666
Make sure the geometry of your tools matches the geometry specified in your CAM software. I think the shoulder on your 1mm tool is hitting the edge of the restoration during the finishing path. This is a very common problem when users change tool brands but don't update the tool geometry in the CAM software. Tool reach and collisions.jpg
 
rivfordental

rivfordental

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
This new piece in the picture bellow, we milled it using the recommendation of margin curves deleted, and 90% milling speed. Still is chiping the margins, 😭😭
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200723_190937.jpg
    IMG_20200723_190937.jpg
    117.8 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_20200723_190825.jpg
    IMG_20200723_190825.jpg
    55.2 KB · Views: 41
  • IMG_20200723_190644.jpg
    IMG_20200723_190644.jpg
    79.3 KB · Views: 43
zero_zero

zero_zero

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,303
Reaction score
1,397
This new piece in the picture bellow, we milled it using the recommendation of margin curves deleted, and 90% milling speed. Still is chiping the margins, 😭😭
Bring it down to 15% or so, keep and eye on it to see when it does chip
 
zero_zero

zero_zero

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,303
Reaction score
1,397
This new piece in the picture bellow, we milled it using the recommendation of margin curves deleted, and 90% milling speed. Still is chiping the margins, 😭😭
Normally it shouldn't chipped that crown... try some brand new burs, see what happens. Try touching the spindle while it mills, do you feel any vibration ?
 
Top Bottom