rkm rdt
Well-Known Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 21,458
- Reaction score
- 3,288
My money is on the printed denture.
My money is on the printed denture.
I can't wait for the profit margin on a printed/digital denture is as low as a FCZ. Or lower. LOL!! Am I the only one saying "Let the race to the floor begin"?? I just saw a Facebook post about a Dr. who is giving courses on "high end" printed/milled dentures LOL!!! The guy is maybe 30 years old!! Oh, and of course there is Lee Culp, right in the middle of this Facebook ad.
Mill this......
I live near Lee Culp's Studio. He invited me over through Facebook some time ago. What is he about? I see that he teaches digital dentures for $5,000 per coarse.I can't wait for the profit margin on a printed/digital denture is as low as a FCZ. Or lower. LOL!! Am I the only one saying "Let the race to the floor begin"?? I just saw a Facebook post about a Dr. who is giving courses on "high end" printed/milled dentures LOL!!! The guy is maybe 30 years old!! Oh, and of course there is Lee Culp, right in the middle of this Facebook ad.
Mill this......
Look at how much more productive digital technology has made C&B. One guy can do what used to require three people. Why would we not want that on the removable side? We already have the required technology for digital dentures. There are some materials trickling out from a couple companies. We're going to start beta testing digital dentures this month and I CAN'T WAIT!
Well, I don't care much about the profit of other labs. I care about the profit of ours. Embracing digital technology has increased our profit margin pretty dramatically. Bottom line is up. That's what matters to me. I expect dentures to do the same.It runs me about $10.00 to make a conventional denture in material costs.
The LMT average resale without teeth is about $350.00 per arch and that's low.
Bill out 2-F/F a day. $1400.00 -$40.00 = $1360.00 pre tax
Based on latest stats from JDT and LMT 49% of c and b labs are making less profit
and 42% of removable labs are making more profit. Difference between the 2 is that c and b has embraced digital
and only 1% of the dentures made last year were fabricated digitally.
The object of the game is make profit. Problem is too many guys thinking with their lab coats on.
So 51% of c & b labs are making the same or more profit .
Employees are more expensive than scanners,printers and mills.
I don't have to wear a lab coat on weekends anymore.
Us too. Just like any other business. Some succeed, some fail."So following that thought, if employees are so expensive, why would labs embracing digital show a decrease in profit with fewer employees?"
I don't know,I'm showing profit.
i beg to differ. it is entirely possible to scan the bone, soft tissue, and face, and get the correct RESTING bite in a fully edentulous patient, and its among our numerous patents (now you know why you don't see it out there)You can't put all of this in a machine
i beg to differ. it is entirely possible to scan the bone, soft tissue, and face, and get the correct RESTING bite in a fully edentulous patient, and its among our numerous patents (now you know why you don't see it out there)
making the software correctly animate that bite into patient-specific movements is proving to be a quick hurdle. precision manufactured removables that dont need relining on the first day is quickly becoming a thing.
the obstacle now is overcoming the terrible lifespan of the prosthetic using newer materials and moving out of acrylics. our time to market is approaching quickly and i eagerly await the angry feedback i'm about to get of people in utter denial.