Kmvb
New Member
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 0
Already smashed before I got here. They are asking me to determine what I think is wrong. I'm not sure how. I just know these are GROSS
is it fair/ethical to be giving out so much subjective judgement on a case that's still current and yet to be finished with permanent cementation ?
Pandora box?
Already smashed before I got here. They are asking me to determine what I think is wrong. I'm not sure how. I just know these are GROSS
Kmvb, if they're asking you what you think is wrong just show them the pictures. If they still dont get it, dont get it! An evaluation can be made by the dds and the lab to make the necessary corrections. Not knowing what the pre-op state was makes it difficult to make a fair assessment. Since you experienced a moderate degree of trauma due to the accident its fair to say the result may not be as ideal as mother nature. I would highly encourage a discussion with your dds and lab an all three thoroughly examine the pictures to make the necessary changes where possible.
"our artistic opinions "
Theres a difference between an artistic opinion and a case that breaks the fundamental rules of aesthetics.
Taking the mid line cant for starters, that is an instant fail for any AACD / BACD accreditation case submission, as it kills 99% of cases from an aesthetic view point.
Now a patient may not realize that but when its right it just looks right, whether they relize why or not.
Im not saying it needs to look like a symetrical fake holywood smile, but there are certain things you do not do, and this result appears to have a few of them.
again regarding the build up, ive never seen a natural tooth with that kind of incisal distribution , it just looks fake and nothing like nature. Its not really an artistic issue, the centrals look like plastic temporaries, there is no vitality in them what so ever.
Maybe you asked for bright white opaque looking teeth?
if so then the lab done a great job.
Without some high quality full face photo's (and im not suggesting you post them here),its not really possible for anyone to make a proper aesthetic assesment.
"our artistic opinions "
Theres a difference between an artistic opinion and a case that breaks the fundamental rules of aesthetics.
Taking the mid line cant for starters, that is an instant fail for any AACD / BACD accreditation case submission, as it kills 99% of cases from an aesthetic view point.
Now a patient may not realize that but when its right it just looks right, whether they relize why or not.
Im not saying it needs to look like a symetrical fake holywood smile, but there are certain things you do not do, and this result appears to have a few of them.
again regarding the build up, ive never seen a natural tooth with that kind of incisal distribution , it just looks fake and nothing like nature. Its not really an artistic issue, the centrals look like plastic temporaries, there is no vitality in them what so ever.
Maybe you asked for bright white opaque looking teeth?
if so then the lab done a great job.
Without some high quality full face photo's (and im not suggesting you post them here),its not really possible for anyone to make a proper aesthetic assesment.
I asked for white teeth at maybe a BL4 shade that look natural and translucent.... I did not want a "Hollywood" smile ... I just didn't want BL1 as it looked like I was a smoker or coffee drinker.. they looked stained...
hopefully you can see this better
I asked for white teeth at maybe a BL4 shade that look natural and translucent.... I did not want a "Hollywood" smile ... I just didn't want BL1 as it looked like I was a smoker or coffee drinker.. they looked stained...
If BL1,,,,, ,I mean B1 looked like theyre stained you really need to take another look at your natural teeth. They're not even close. This is a case of when a patient has a little knowledge but really does not comprehend fully. A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. It appears you know what you want but really dont. The restorations appears to be pressed, therefore they can be removed , cutback; and layered to approximate your shade. Their decision to make them lighter was from a technical standpoint that its easier to make value and chromatic changes. Once retrieved the cant and contours can be addressed fully......
kmvb, you're not making this easy one bit. As was asked a few times before, post some high quality pictures. ie. high resolution close ups, bi lateral views, full face if yo want to,,,totally up to you. And please please, please post the pics properly...i know your in Cali but "Sideways" does not count,,,,,,dont know if i should twist my neck or put my laptop sideways.
@ DCP1977
No your not the only one!