DMC
Banned
- Messages
- 6,378
- Reaction score
- 260
Tuning the KaVo for high-performance
I have been milling the same few teeth over and over and over since Monday.
Dialing in the feed and step and rpm and about 100 other parameters for Titanium. We have a "PFM" and an "Anatomy" strategy so far.
The finished product is 10x better looking then the OEM KaVo.
For starters, the internal finishing of the KaVo CAM Strategy looks to me to be about 125-200uM step inside. YIKES! I can see the rings from a foot away!
My strategy has tight 40uM rings (actually a continuous spiral) at minimum and .03mm at the area closest to the margin. It looks almost like mirror finish close-up.
We do a dual zig-zag pass on occlusal for anything with anatomy at -45 and 45 degree angles with a tight 50um step with smallest bur at a 1800mm/min. feed. (Waaaay faster than the KaVo strategy) and that is 32000RPM. The occlusal is ready for polishing with minimum labor.
The KaVo has a Spindle limit of 80,000rpm and a max feed of 3000
We can program many many different feeds for a single operation.
ex.
- Z-feed (only going down to next Z-depth)
- X-Y feed for normal cutting
- Maximum material removal feed (when tool is against walls or the tooth...not in the middle area)
- tight corner feed (user definable)
- edge feed (user definable
- no material removal feed (rapid-trans. feed)
etc.
I have a most excellent product in a faster time. Kinda happy!
Little over 20 minutes for the Full Anatomy Strategy.
Just under 18 min. for the coping version.
I stand by the mill with a flashlight and watch everything.
I am happy with the internal side, and have just been milling the same occlusal over and over today. We eliminate the instructions for the stuff we already have sorted. No need to see that again. I cut those tools out of the strategy to finish working out the top only.
I run around the building to show everyone what is good and bad, and what to change to fix it. We change only one parameter at a time if we can help it. Sometime you just know you need major adjustments and change many things, but we try to be scientific about it. I am trying to find a surface finish that is like..."WOW"! for a milled metal surface to polish....in a decent time. It takes 50uM, or less, step unfortunatly to make that happen. I think we will have to go down to 40 or 35uM on the occlusal Zig-Zag to get super-funky awesome surface finish.
I defined a tool incorrectly. It was a conical shaped tool, and I was one degree off in the taper of the tool. The shank of the tool slightly rubbed on material. (Minor collision). It made a subtle difference in audible noise, and I could see the Gold coating wearing off the tool above the cutting flutes. I stopped that cycle and re-measured the tool and programmed that new shape into the CAM.
Same type of mistake with the reach of another tool. We have been over hundreds and hundreds of changes all week. I'm almost done.
It takes about Twenty-Fourty milling hours to dial in a new material and tools at minimum. IMO. Than you will be tweeking it forever!
I have been milling the same few teeth over and over and over since Monday.
Dialing in the feed and step and rpm and about 100 other parameters for Titanium. We have a "PFM" and an "Anatomy" strategy so far.
The finished product is 10x better looking then the OEM KaVo.
For starters, the internal finishing of the KaVo CAM Strategy looks to me to be about 125-200uM step inside. YIKES! I can see the rings from a foot away!
My strategy has tight 40uM rings (actually a continuous spiral) at minimum and .03mm at the area closest to the margin. It looks almost like mirror finish close-up.
We do a dual zig-zag pass on occlusal for anything with anatomy at -45 and 45 degree angles with a tight 50um step with smallest bur at a 1800mm/min. feed. (Waaaay faster than the KaVo strategy) and that is 32000RPM. The occlusal is ready for polishing with minimum labor.
The KaVo has a Spindle limit of 80,000rpm and a max feed of 3000
We can program many many different feeds for a single operation.
ex.
- Z-feed (only going down to next Z-depth)
- X-Y feed for normal cutting
- Maximum material removal feed (when tool is against walls or the tooth...not in the middle area)
- tight corner feed (user definable)
- edge feed (user definable
- no material removal feed (rapid-trans. feed)
etc.
I have a most excellent product in a faster time. Kinda happy!
Little over 20 minutes for the Full Anatomy Strategy.
Just under 18 min. for the coping version.
I stand by the mill with a flashlight and watch everything.
I am happy with the internal side, and have just been milling the same occlusal over and over today. We eliminate the instructions for the stuff we already have sorted. No need to see that again. I cut those tools out of the strategy to finish working out the top only.
I run around the building to show everyone what is good and bad, and what to change to fix it. We change only one parameter at a time if we can help it. Sometime you just know you need major adjustments and change many things, but we try to be scientific about it. I am trying to find a surface finish that is like..."WOW"! for a milled metal surface to polish....in a decent time. It takes 50uM, or less, step unfortunatly to make that happen. I think we will have to go down to 40 or 35uM on the occlusal Zig-Zag to get super-funky awesome surface finish.
I defined a tool incorrectly. It was a conical shaped tool, and I was one degree off in the taper of the tool. The shank of the tool slightly rubbed on material. (Minor collision). It made a subtle difference in audible noise, and I could see the Gold coating wearing off the tool above the cutting flutes. I stopped that cycle and re-measured the tool and programmed that new shape into the CAM.
Same type of mistake with the reach of another tool. We have been over hundreds and hundreds of changes all week. I'm almost done.
It takes about Twenty-Fourty milling hours to dial in a new material and tools at minimum. IMO. Than you will be tweeking it forever!
Last edited: