Only use Noble because of price. Haven't used HN in many years, and only used NP for a few years back in the 80's.
rlhhds, you said you educated your doctors that the only difference in N and HN is price, sorry you are wrong.
Do a little research on Captek and higher gold content HN alloys and you will be a little more educated. Is it worth the difference ? If I could, I would use Captek to replace all pfms, and my pfms are becoming obsolete in my lab by the week like yours.
I'm educating my doctors on why use pfms with the benefits of monolithic emax, zir layered bridges, and full contoured zir that glazed and polished.
Its been a win win for me and my doctors. Now my doctors will stop seeing black margins later on down the road, hopefully no or much less layered porcelain chipping, considerably lower failures with monolithic crowns, plus a $ saving to the doctors.
The few doctors that ask for HN are probably the very best doctors that a lab could work for. I would educate them on monolithic materials, cad/cam designed crowns, Captek, and include reasons to not use HN cast alloys (mainly price) other than type 3 alloys.
There's a place for most materials we use in the lab, but.... "Times are Changing in the Modern Dental Lab", and its all about Education, keeping up with the best materials, and when not to use them.
My $.02