T
tuyere
Active Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 522
- Solutions
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey all,
We recently picked up a C-clamp holder so we can do 90-degree milling on zirconia for ZIBs and large bridges, but we're getting lousy results. We've tried it with painted-on special milling designations, as well as unpainted 90-deg milling (where I guess it automatically figures out where it's appropriate to switch to face milling), and in both cases the 90-degree milling areas are significantly deeper than the rest, and have a poor finish compared to the other areas. I ran a manual calibration wax disc on the mill and the results were good, all within tolerances and didn't need adjusting. Other parts run on the mill (non-90-deg bridges, crowns etc) look fine. I'd guess it's a tool height issue if the mill didn't verify tool height every time it does a tool change. Maybe it's a CAM issue, the designation painting or the milling operations we're opting for? I'm not sure.
We recently picked up a C-clamp holder so we can do 90-degree milling on zirconia for ZIBs and large bridges, but we're getting lousy results. We've tried it with painted-on special milling designations, as well as unpainted 90-deg milling (where I guess it automatically figures out where it's appropriate to switch to face milling), and in both cases the 90-degree milling areas are significantly deeper than the rest, and have a poor finish compared to the other areas. I ran a manual calibration wax disc on the mill and the results were good, all within tolerances and didn't need adjusting. Other parts run on the mill (non-90-deg bridges, crowns etc) look fine. I'd guess it's a tool height issue if the mill didn't verify tool height every time it does a tool change. Maybe it's a CAM issue, the designation painting or the milling operations we're opting for? I'm not sure.