rlhhds
Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 461
- Reaction score
- 56
Who's using it and what do you think.
In the eyes of a ceramist its still a temp crown. Cannot put into an oven and any adjustment made to it occlusion and contact has to use composite to do so.
Yes its Fizzgig from Dark Crystal. I agree with you on the design part occlusion and contacts . But you will always have that one case come back from a doctor for an adjustment that needs a contact added to it.
"Just attended a course last night.I mentioned to the Lecturer about LU and he told me of a failure/fracture he had on a molar.It was his third LU."
Well i mentioned this a while back but docs are using this material as a bulk enamel replacement.. Its composite... it flexes!
lots of flex with cement retained restorations is not good..
So much for that teeth in an hour idea.
maybe its less of an issue on implants where the abutment is very rigid. I can also see the valid benefit of using a flexible material here due to the lack of periodentium.
on a natural abutment though where you've removed all the rigid enamel, you end up with soft flexible dentine, with a soft flexible crown. Thats bio mechanics stright out the window there. end result is a weaker tooth with no rigid support (eg enamel, emax),and alot of flex causing the seal to fail?
are the cement failures still happening on implant abutments or is the extra regidity enough to off set the issue? is it an issue of cement choice, maybe a hybrid resin is less of an issue?? lots of unanswered questions.
Last time i looked i couldnt find a figure for the elastic modulus of this material? if its any where near composite (around 20gpa),its miles away from enamel.
cant be bothered to read all the research on this material as i have no interest in offering it, and no clients interested in prescribing it, so i wont bash it head on.
Maybe someone that has can add to this..