Trios to Exocad?

rkm rdt

rkm rdt

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
21,448
Reaction score
3,288
Hi,

First of all, let me clarify the "update contract required" situation:

If you want updates, you can buy them.

If you don't want updates, your existing exocad version will continue to work.
You just won't be able to use newer versions that came out after the update contract expired. I think that's really much different from forcing update fees upon users, no matter if they want the updates or not.

Some of our users like to stick with what they're used to, even if they're missing great new featuers. So, when it comes to exocad updates, there's no free lunch, but there's no need to pay for lunch if you're not hungry either.

Second, let me comment about the instructions *** posted (or rather, "leaked"): These OEM configuration instructions are targeted at the IT professionals at the system integrators who pre-configure the exocad release, before rolling it out to their end users.

If the system integrator choses to enable the TRIOS import feature, then their customers will have a "TRIOS import" button which they can click - it's absolutely novice-friendly. However, some exocad resellers may chose not to enable this feature.

One further important comment:
The forum user exocad-usa is not affiliated with exocad in any way; quite obviously, his writing style (laughing about IT novices, etc) is not in line with our company ethics either.
I would appreciate if you'd change your user name.

All the best,
Tillmann
CEO, exocad GmbH

Maybe you should call him Scotty instead....or ***....or Primus.

Sorry Mr Tillman but he is affiliated with exocad after all.

Perhaps you could persuade him to pay for that ethics module upgrade.
 
CAD BANE

CAD BANE

Member
Full Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
18
Tillmann
CEO, exocad GmbH

This is the best quote on this whole thread:
"when it comes to exocad updates, there's no free lunch, but there's no need to pay for lunch if you're not hungry either."

As an experienced user/owner of both 3Shape and Exocad, I found great joy reading through this thread. Thanks for clearing the air Till with that great quote, I love it!
 
J

Jorge

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
225
Reaction score
9
I still have a computer running Windows XP
I have not upgraded to Windows Vista, nor 7 neither 8, it but it continues working like first day, no more no less.
I think Exocad is like that, if you do not upgrade, technology becames old and posibly obsolete, but it continues working.
 
zero_zero

zero_zero

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,305
Reaction score
1,397
............
I think Exocad is like that, if you do not upgrade, technology becames old and posibly obsolete, but it continues working.

If you're into copings and simple full contour then you're set...tooth morphology won't change in the forseable future...;)
 
D

davidnel212

New Member
Full Member
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Rob, those are not my works. That was written by Germans. OK?

Do you really not understand the license deal?

Buy a Dongle....get One year updates at any time.

Even Four years later...you can use any build date from the time you plug in the Dongle to the following year.

Maybe people have all sort of versions of exocad on their PC released during that time frame.
Hi ***

Could you help me, I need to convert Magnification to Shrinkage expressed in a percentage.
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,095
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
he aint here no more man
 
C

charles007

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
453
CoolHand, *** is still here, you just don't see him.... he still gives out Dislikes lol
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,095
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
Very well, can you help me then?
assume part size is P (stands for Part)

if you have a shrinkage factor on your zirconia block, use that number as S (for Shrinkage)

M (Magnification) = P / S

M = 1/S

expressed as a percent % = (S-1)/S x 100

however remember the Ceramill magnification doesnt work this way; it has its own value set and is not open.
 
D

davidnel212

New Member
Full Member
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I dont have a shrinkage factor, only have a magnification faxtor of 1.2247 that I need to get converted to a shrinking %, need to have explained how to do so


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,095
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
that doesnt sound right
 
D

davidnel212

New Member
Full Member
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
assume part size is P (stands for Part)

if you have a shrinkage factor on your zirconia block, use that number as S (for Shrinkage)

M (Magnification) = P / S

M = 1/S

expressed as a percent % = (S-1)/S x 100

however remember the Ceramill magnification doesnt work this way; it has its own value set and is not open.
Hi

Show me with this formula how to convert 1.2247 Magnification to Shrinkage %, pls.
 
zero_zero

zero_zero

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,305
Reaction score
1,397
Ok, but how did you get to 18.34%? Pls put it to me in Layman's terms pls.

The formula is:

Percentage = ( 1 - ( 1 / S )) x 100

Where "S" is the magnification factor printed on the Zr blanks...e.g. 1.2456

Think of it like a ratio... 1.2456 to 1... got it ? ;)
 
rkm rdt

rkm rdt

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
21,448
Reaction score
3,288
Got it.

That's why I send to a milling center.:D
 
zero_zero

zero_zero

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,305
Reaction score
1,397
You think they've passed grade six ? :D
 
rkm rdt

rkm rdt

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
21,448
Reaction score
3,288
If I had passed grade 6 the first time, I wouldn't have been a dental tech.;)
 
D

davidnel212

New Member
Full Member
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
The formula is:

Percentage = ( 1 - ( 1 / S )) x 100

Where "S" is the magnification factor printed on the Zr blanks...e.g. 1.2456

Think of it like a ratio... 1.2456 to 1... got it ? ;)
Hi
I tried this and the crowns came out way to small. Any reason for it?
 
Top Bottom