Asiga Pro2 75 in action!

[GoldRunner]

For fun.....I scanned an impression with my D1000 and printed a model. Really a viable workflow with excellent results. If I had to do lab work alone I would never pour another model. Tried some different model and die options. The DMEs that WM gives you are the best place to start (not used in first photo). Fantastic results! I did have a stone model as verification and the fit was great. Also check out some sample photos of simple quadrant and more complex implant work. Still trying to figure out all the nuances of IOS DMI workflow.

Hope this information helps. Thank you guys for sharing on DLN.

IOS from 3M Tru-Def

Single crown from Tru-def

IOS from Trios

IOS from Trios. Nobel Biocare multi. Complex workflow for this one. This was a Dreve print that inspired me to find a printer capable of similar quality. The Asiga Pro2 is the answer.

 

[Andy B]

looks good!

 

[prestige.dental]

For fun.....I scanned an impression with my D1000 and printed a model. Really a viable workflow with excellent results. If I had to do lab work alone I would never pour another model. Tried some different model and die options. The DMEs that WM gives you are the best place to start (not used in first photo). Fantastic results! I did have a stone model as verification and the fit was great. Also check out some sample photos of simple quadrant and more complex implant work. Still trying to figure out all the nuances of IOS DMI workflow.

Hope this information helps. Thank you guys for sharing on DLN.

IOS from 3M Tru-Def

Single crown from Tru-def

IOS from Trios

IOS from Trios. Nobel Biocare multi. Complex workflow for this one. This was a Dreve print that inspired me to find a printer capable of similar quality. The Asiga Pro2 is the answer.

So this printer is accurate enough to do a screw retained implant crowns and bridges.
No need to buy 80k printer !

 

[Bryce Hiller]

Nice work. We have an Asiga Max on order and should be here next month. Very much looking forward to working with it. Digital is no longer the future, but the present.

 

[sidesh0wb0b]

very nice, thanks for sharing
why block out your lab name though? lol

 

[sidesh0wb0b]

oh, forgot to ask....
whats the time for printing a set of quadrants? full arch?

 

[eyeloveteeth]

the Asiga Max is insanely fast @ 50 microns it'll do close to 4 hours on the picture i linked. @ 100 microns and it'll do that same job in 2 hours.


Full Disclosure - it took the Carbon M1 2 hours and 20 minutes to print at 50 microns though

 

[sidesh0wb0b]

the Asiga Max is insanely fast @ 50 microns it'll do close to 4 hours on the picture i linked. @ 100 microns and it'll do that same job in 2 hours.


Full Disclosure - it took the Carbon M1 2 hours and 20 minutes to print at 50 microns though

so 4 hours and it will print 5 models?
if i understand what you just said correctly. which is a shot in the dark LOL

 

[eyeloveteeth]

well it's mostly the height that you're looking at. so if one of the models is unusually high, it will increase the time it gets to that layer.

 

[sidesh0wb0b]

well it's mostly the height that you're looking at. so if one of the models is unusually high, it will increase the time it gets to that layer.

yep, i know the drill as far as printing and height goes.
4hr for 5 models....is an extremely long time IMHO. an average tech can make twice as many in just as long and have them articulated too. one day i swear printing will make leaps, but i just dont see it there yet.

 

[Bryce Hiller]

yep, i know the drill as far as printing and height goes.
4hr for 5 models....is an extremely long time IMHO. an average tech can make twice as many in just as long and have them articulated too. one day i swear printing will make leaps, but i just dont see it there yet.

I think the benefit comes in other forms. For example, we run dental wings. We import the stl from an IOS, build the model nest and print. But we can also design the crown from the same file. So for us, it essentially combines two processes (Model work and scanning). Plus, the printing process is pretty much hands off once your models are nested (which can be done in a jiffy, if you know what you're doing). The benefit is definitely there.

 

[sidesh0wb0b]

I think the benefit comes in other forms. For example, we run dental wings. We import the stl from an IOS, build the model nest and print. But we can also design the crown from the same file. So for us, it essentially combines two processes (Model work and scanning). Plus, the printing process is pretty much hands off once your models are nested (which can be done in a jiffy, if you know what you're doing). The benefit is definitely there.

yes, if youre getting a bunch of IOS impressions it would have a benefit. ive been wholly disappointed with every IOS and printed model ive had to deal with. maybe im just bitter lol

 

[Cory@WhipMix]

The prints look amazing!!! Awesome Job!

For fun.....I scanned an impression with my D1000 and printed a model. Really a viable workflow with excellent results. If I had to do lab work alone I would never pour another model. Tried some different model and die options. The DMEs that WM gives you are the best place to start (not used in first photo). Fantastic results! I did have a stone model as verification and the fit was great. Also check out some sample photos of simple quadrant and more complex implant work. Still trying to figure out all the nuances of IOS DMI workflow.

Hope this information helps. Thank you guys for sharing on DLN.

IOS from 3M Tru-Def

Single crown from Tru-def

IOS from Trios

IOS from Trios. Nobel Biocare multi. Complex workflow for this one. This was a Dreve print that inspired me to find a printer capable of similar quality. The Asiga Pro2 is the answer.