Analog-Model Fit Calibration Parts for Printing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuyere
  • Start date Start date
T

tuyere

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
714
Solutions
2
Reaction score
0
Howdy folks,

Was wondering if anybody knows of models for fine-tuning our printed model-analog fit-up- something like a block containing the common analog holes for a given system, with a range of sizes for each hole reflecting the different model-analog gaps you might opt for during design.
Our lab is big and it takes a while for feedback to work its way between departments, every time something about our printing changes enough to mess with the analog fit, there's a trial-and-error back-and-forth between designers, printing techs, and the implant-handling techs down the line. It can take days to organically arrive back at a point where everybody's happy.
So! I'm looking for a single part/suite of parts that I can print on request that'll let the implant folks immediately determine their preferred settings for a given printer and/or resin combo + configuration, one print job, vs. the status quo of printing a bunch of poorly-fitting production models that sluggishly return to a good fit over the course of a week. I can generally 3D model whatever I might need, but I know very little about implant systems or about the design process, so I wouldn't know what's of use to people or the sorts of analog-model gaps that represent a good starting point. Or where to get the geometries of the analog holes in question, for that matter, but I think Design can set that up for me on our end.
 
Howdy folks,

Was wondering if anybody knows of models for fine-tuning our printed model-analog fit-up- something like a block containing the common analog holes for a given system, with a range of sizes for each hole reflecting the different model-analog gaps you might opt for during design.
Our lab is big and it takes a while for feedback to work its way between departments, every time something about our printing changes enough to mess with the analog fit, there's a trial-and-error back-and-forth between designers, printing techs, and the implant-handling techs down the line. It can take days to organically arrive back at a point where everybody's happy.
So! I'm looking for a single part/suite of parts that I can print on request that'll let the implant folks immediately determine their preferred settings for a given printer and/or resin combo + configuration, one print job, vs. the status quo of printing a bunch of poorly-fitting production models that sluggishly return to a good fit over the course of a week. I can generally 3D model whatever I might need, but I know very little about implant systems or about the design process, so I wouldn't know what's of use to people or the sorts of analog-model gaps that represent a good starting point. Or where to get the geometries of the analog holes in question, for that matter, but I think Design can set that up for me on our end.
In my CoDiagnostix surgical guide software, they give you an stl that you can print for each sleeve you use. The stl has many different sleeve holes with slightly different diameters so you can dial in the fit. This would be excellent for model analogs too. I don't know of anything like this.
 
In my CoDiagnostix surgical guide software, they give you an stl that you can print for each sleeve you use. The stl has many different sleeve holes with slightly different diameters so you can dial in the fit. This would be excellent for model analogs too. I don't know of anything like this.
Yeah, that's exactly what I'm thinking. Weird that someone- i.e., the implant companies- haven't cooked something like this up yet, it's a pretty standard design aid for 3D-printed assemblies that require a specific fit-up + where the end-users' print results can vary widely.

Secondary question- probably a long shot, but do implant companies happen to ever publish dimensioned schematics of analog geometries? If I can reconstruct them from first principles, that's ideal for me, everything would flow pretty quickly from that- but that's very hard to do accurately if extrapolating the designer's intent from a scan or direct part measurements, and scans themselves are too approximate to use directly.
 
I can make you a quick jig, Ide rather make it specific to the systems you use than just general though, what are the more widely used systems in your lab
 
Top Bottom