2thm8kr
Beanosavedmysociallife
Full Member
- Messages
- 11,304
- Reaction score
- 2,510
Ah, that's what those things are for.a calendar ?
Ah, that's what those things are for.a calendar ?
that's mean the analogue in the library u use to design model is different of the one you have in hand.problem is when you design the straumann abutment, and get their special analog to put in the model, the tissue is all jacked up. It's almost like you have to index the itero model, then cut it back, and then put soft tissue in, then but abutment in....
Are you able to use ModelBuilder with the IOS scans - in other words, do you have the .dme files for the scan bodies and repositionable analog? I'm saying if you can create an .stl file for the model with a receptacle for the analog, I can print your models. I've done a handful of cases using TruDef scans and the Core 3D scan bodies / analogs, and the process works. PM me if you are interested and I will send you my phone number so we can discuss.I have the library and we are currently sending design files through 3shape for Straumann to mill. The problem is processing IOS cases that the doctor uses the Straumann scan bodies. Getting a model made off of a 3M scan is going to be a hassle. The turn around time is going to be way too long to finish out a case like this.
no it's not the analogue fit....that's mean the analogue in the library u use to design model is different of the one you have in hand.
Are models from "Innovation MediTech" good enough for inlays/onlays? Guys can you sugest which way is better to produce digital model fron intra scan? Printing vs. Milling?
Thanks a lot for your time
The way I understand it, ( don't even go there),milled models are patented through ITero/ In visalign.. Therefore printed models are the only option for other IOS systems.
Keep in mind that no matter what you design and fabricate from an ios, the model is used to verify your design,not to fabricate from. Porcelain layering is the exception of course.
Straumann has the geometries for the hole where the repositioning analog goes. They want us to purchase the CS2 model builder software to process the model files annnnddd I'm not doing that. We don't do enough of those cases to pay for the software.Are you able to use ModelBuilder with the IOS scans - in other words, do you have the .dme files for the scan bodies and repositionable analog? I'm saying if you can create an .stl file for the model with a receptacle for the analog, I can print your models. I've done a handful of cases using TruDef scans and the Core 3D scan bodies / analogs, and the process works. PM me if you are interested and I will send you my phone number so we can discuss.
Printing!Are models from "Innovation MediTech" good enough for inlays/onlays? Guys can you sugest which way is better to produce digital model fron intra scan? Printing vs. Milling?
Thanks a lot for your time
If I wanted to waste a mill on model milling, I have blanks to do that. It's just not practical.The way I understand it, ( don't even go there),milled models are patented through ITero/ In visalign.. Therefore printed models are the only option for other IOS systems.
Keep in mind that no matter what you design and fabricate from an ios, the model is used to verify your design,not to fabricate from. Porcelain layering is the exception of course.