Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Equipment
Tuning the KaVo for high-preformance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DMC" data-source="post: 46650" data-attributes="member: 430"><p>[ATTACH=full]9021[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>OK. So if we have an accurate cut at 100uM spacing on the rings...we end up with only .003 Scallop Height, or extra material left on the inside surface.</p><p></p><p>I was very wrong in my assumption on that figure. .003mm is OK I guess?</p><p></p><p>This is with a 1mm tool diameter or .5 tool radius. (same thing)</p><p>It is just obvious to the naked eye, and my camera the difference changing this can make. I think the KaVo Z step is more like 200uM or about <img src="/forums/images/smilies/test/five.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="Five" title="Five Five" data-shortname="Five" /> rings per mm of depth, and the Scallop height is much greater.</p><p></p><p>I have mine set maybe too tight? Like at .03uM step?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]9021[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DMC, post: 46650, member: 430"] [attach=full]9021[/attach] OK. So if we have an accurate cut at 100uM spacing on the rings...we end up with only .003 Scallop Height, or extra material left on the inside surface. I was very wrong in my assumption on that figure. .003mm is OK I guess? This is with a 1mm tool diameter or .5 tool radius. (same thing) It is just obvious to the naked eye, and my camera the difference changing this can make. I think the KaVo Z step is more like 200uM or about Five rings per mm of depth, and the Scallop height is much greater. I have mine set maybe too tight? Like at .03uM step? [ATTACH=full]9021[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Equipment
Tuning the KaVo for high-preformance
Top
Bottom