Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Metal
SLM Frameworks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Car 54" data-source="post: 291765" data-attributes="member: 85"><p>Agree</p><p></p><p>To anyone, has the C&B SLM improved over the years? Is the DPM more accurate than the last time I tried them (Argen) about 3 years ago?</p><p>I liked the selection of the metals better with the DPM. I could get a 5% silver 40 HN alloy cp to the SLM which has 10% silver EURO HN alloy which I'd rather stay away from.</p><p></p><p>For now, I can mill wax-ups that fit really nice, but I'd rather quit buying metal when pfm's are getting to be less and less of my production.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Car 54, post: 291765, member: 85"] Agree To anyone, has the C&B SLM improved over the years? Is the DPM more accurate than the last time I tried them (Argen) about 3 years ago? I liked the selection of the metals better with the DPM. I could get a 5% silver 40 HN alloy cp to the SLM which has 10% silver EURO HN alloy which I'd rather stay away from. For now, I can mill wax-ups that fit really nice, but I'd rather quit buying metal when pfm's are getting to be less and less of my production. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Metal
SLM Frameworks
Top
Bottom