Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Equipment
Roland dwx42 w
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chad Gardner" data-source="post: 326391" data-attributes="member: 20677"><p>I have the Roland 52D and it is a tank! A bit slower than other mills but I believe that’s why it is so dependable. I have a friend with the 42 wet mill and he has never had a problem with it in 2 years. And his crowns are beautiful. I’m going to get one January 2021. I wanna see how the AmberMill pucks do for a little longer before buying. </p><p>For the price and quality, it’s hard to beat Roland IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chad Gardner, post: 326391, member: 20677"] I have the Roland 52D and it is a tank! A bit slower than other mills but I believe that’s why it is so dependable. I have a friend with the 42 wet mill and he has never had a problem with it in 2 years. And his crowns are beautiful. I’m going to get one January 2021. I wanna see how the AmberMill pucks do for a little longer before buying. For the price and quality, it’s hard to beat Roland IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Equipment
Roland dwx42 w
Top
Bottom