Pressables and Zirconia

cheadlemick

cheadlemick

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
703
Reaction score
41
Hi everybody, I'm doing a lecture on materials,specifically E-Max and zirconia! Does anybody out there have any info,knowledge,or experience of Dicor,Cerestore or Hi-Ceram? I'm looking at the development of the modern materials from materials such as these. Also can anybody let me know why Empress 2 was such a disaster?
By the way i'm a Dental Tech so have a good amount of knowledge of the modern stuff so im looking for something out of the ordinary! Just snippets will do! Many thanks in advance

Mick

p.s I will
be giving full acknowledgement to any body who contributes!
 
Mark Jackson

Mark Jackson

New Member
Messages
1,908
Reaction score
13
Hi everybody, I'm doing a lecture on materials,specifically E-Max and zirconia! Does anybody out there have any info,knowledge,or experience of Dicor,Cerestore or Hi-Ceram?

I had all those systems.

ai3.photobucket.com_albums_y79_Ngagi_dicorplaque.jpg
ai3.photobucket.com_albums_y79_Ngagi_dicorplaque.jpg
 
user name

user name

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,960
Reaction score
1,633
Dicor...It was expensive to get into, only one material supplier and the cost of glass shot up. Not terribly strong. No way to controll opacity. I prefered to do all ceramic anteriors with refractory and Optec. Once Finesse came along with both press and powders, thats where I went.

e.max changed everything.
 
cheadlemick

cheadlemick

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
703
Reaction score
41
Dicor...It was expensive to get into, only one material supplier and the cost of glass shot up. Not terribly strong. No way to controll opacity. I prefered to do all ceramic anteriors with refractory and Optec. Once Finesse came along with both press and powders, thats where I went.

e.max changed everything.

excellent stuff im trying to build a timeline of the development of all ceramic crowns from the PJC PT foil Dicor and Cerestore and HiCeram to the present day!
 
BobCDT

BobCDT

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,870
Reaction score
521
Empress 2 was actually lithium desilicate or todays e.max first generation. Initially it was too opaque to be a monolithic material. So, Ivoclar developed a layering system to put on Empress 2 frameworks. To make a long short, The TCE didn't match and there were thousands of units delaminating in the mouth. In addition I think there were problems with the reaction layer not being fully removed. This also contributed to the delaminating of the layering material.
Bob
 
BobCDT

BobCDT

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,870
Reaction score
521
Produced a lot of Dicor. It looks great when matching shade D2. Only one color material. At the time cement technology was nothing like today. If i recall correctly we didnt etch the restorations, nor were they bonded. As a result, like all of the all ceramic predecessors it failed more than an acceptable amount. not sure what the flexure strength was. Probably under 150MPa.
From a manufacturing perspective, there where also problems. The glass was not that dissimilar from pressed ceramics. But, Dicor was cast using centrifugal force. The casting temp was extrimely narrow and casting was unpredictable. For the time the system and materials were expensive and Dentsply was of little help with technical
Support. Corning, partnered with Dentsply and also offered no real support.
I think my age is starting to show.
Bob
 
BobCDT

BobCDT

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,870
Reaction score
521
Time table:
Alluminious jacket crown introduced in the late 70s or early 80s by Vita. Platinum foil matrix. Layered high strength core and porcelain application. Great esthetic results.
Dicor mid 80s
Cerestore late 80s (never made one)
Empress early90s
These are approximate intro time frames.
Bob
 
user name

user name

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,960
Reaction score
1,633
You forgot to give some credit...Dicor was a Coors-Corning idea. Id bet, looking back, the ingots were almost a pyrex glass. I believe another problem with the empress 2 was soft tissues showing a little reaction, so the prep guides were changed saying that margins should be .5mm above the gums. For the ultimate in esthetics, it had to be Finesse. Pressable ingots galore and beautiful porcelain.
 
user name

user name

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
6,960
Reaction score
1,633
What was that aluminous core stuff...Willglass? Willceram?
 
CatamountRob

CatamountRob

Banned Member
Full Member
Messages
7,399
Reaction score
1,531
What about Inceram? We did them, but I can't remember what it was.
 
BobCDT

BobCDT

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,870
Reaction score
521
Never did Inceram. Strong core. Too many failures.
I think Dicor was developed by a lab tech in Boston and later sold to Dentsply and Corning.
The alumina core jacket crown was an alumina (high strenght) build up on platinum foil matrix. High temp firing cycle. Then, conventional porcelain build up, stain and glaze. This was a Vita product and was really great looking.
B
 
EJADA

EJADA

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
792
Reaction score
116
Empress 2 was actually lithium desilicate or todays e.max first generation. Initially it was too opaque to be a monolithic material. So, Ivoclar developed a layering system to put on Empress 2 frameworks. To make a long short, The TCE didn't match and there were thousands of units delaminating in the mouth. In addition I think there were problems with the reaction layer not being fully removed. This also contributed to the delaminating of the layering material.
Bob



Let us not forget about Eris. (empress 2 repackaged with the CTE issue fixed) I made hundreds of successful Eris most of which are still in use. I was a great product that got the Empress 2 bad wrap. Then of course the original Empress beautiful just to weak.
 
BobCDT

BobCDT

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,870
Reaction score
521
Let us not forget about Eris. (empress 2 repackaged with the CTE issue fixed) I made hundreds of successful Eris most of which are still in use. I was a great product that got the Empress 2 bad wrap. Then of course the original Empress beautiful just to weak.

Hi,
I agree, Eris was a great product.
Bob
 
Top Bottom