Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Next Evolution in Zirconia: "Cube X 2, Imagine, ZZ Anterior
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="charles007" data-source="post: 170054" data-attributes="member: 9"><p>Yes these materials cost more but we must look at the total picture and how pricing different materials can change our labs.</p><p>Pressing ingots requires a lot less in equipment investment $$ than milling inhouse or outsourcing zirconia having a scanner only. But labs charge much less for FCZ than pressed emax. This theory of pricing doesn't make a dollars worth of sense. Pressing can be highly profitable but what if a lot of labs started charging $99.00 for emax ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="charles007, post: 170054, member: 9"] Yes these materials cost more but we must look at the total picture and how pricing different materials can change our labs. Pressing ingots requires a lot less in equipment investment $$ than milling inhouse or outsourcing zirconia having a scanner only. But labs charge much less for FCZ than pressed emax. This theory of pricing doesn't make a dollars worth of sense. Pressing can be highly profitable but what if a lot of labs started charging $99.00 for emax ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Next Evolution in Zirconia: "Cube X 2, Imagine, ZZ Anterior
Top
Bottom