Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Next Evolution in Zirconia: "Cube X 2, Imagine, ZZ Anterior
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="charles007" data-source="post: 170051" data-attributes="member: 9"><p>What I fear is labs charging about the same for CubeX as their regular fcz. These newer generation zirconia's are on another playing field and we shouldn't charge the same price. What will most likely happen is doctors will start requesting more monolithic restorations and labs will see a drop in profits. This material is comparable to emax and we should strongly consider pricing at the price level of emax.</p><p>I can easily see many doctors doing nothing but mono CubeX except on high demanding patients on single unit centrals. If priced much higher, that would be a dream lab and save on the cost of stocking porcelain. If priced to low, I see everything turning in to $99.00 crowns.. <img src="/forums/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/arghh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":arghh:" title="arghh :arghh:" data-shortname=":arghh:" /></p><p>I don't want to see the bottom feeding labs growing, and I know that will happen eventually.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="charles007, post: 170051, member: 9"] What I fear is labs charging about the same for CubeX as their regular fcz. These newer generation zirconia's are on another playing field and we shouldn't charge the same price. What will most likely happen is doctors will start requesting more monolithic restorations and labs will see a drop in profits. This material is comparable to emax and we should strongly consider pricing at the price level of emax. I can easily see many doctors doing nothing but mono CubeX except on high demanding patients on single unit centrals. If priced much higher, that would be a dream lab and save on the cost of stocking porcelain. If priced to low, I see everything turning in to $99.00 crowns.. :arghh: I don't want to see the bottom feeding labs growing, and I know that will happen eventually. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Next Evolution in Zirconia: "Cube X 2, Imagine, ZZ Anterior
Top
Bottom