Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
My new, new scanner....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paulg100" data-source="post: 95781" data-attributes="member: 1643"><p>"Multiple people say 3shape can produce a bar that fits good enough, from experience. Others, with there own agenda, that hate 3shape, say it cant. So who is right?"</p><p></p><p>1. you look for independent published research. It can still be manipulated but its generally more accurate than an opinion hidden behind an agenda. And my god theres so much of that when it comes to cad/cam its not true.</p><p></p><p>2. if theres no INDEPENDENT research, then you see it with your own eyes over several cases.</p><p></p><p>"Anyone have any pictures of a 3shape bar??"</p><p></p><p>some macro images of the marginal seal would be nice, but that still wont show us if there's consistent closed margins or a rock across the span. </p><p></p><p>you really have to get stuck in and see it for yourself i think.</p><p></p><p>been to two major cad/cam companies in the UK that "lots of techs" say put out great fitting frames. Both of the multi unit bridge samples they showed me were rocking! and i assume this was there best effort.</p><p></p><p>one thing i can say.. the bar fits im getting from Biomet 3i have been awesome so far. But then there scanning the models with uber expensive scanners (as they wont accept 3shape/meddit etc) and ultimately its just my opinion of what awesome is (under x15 mag)</p><p></p><p>No agenda or bias, if a company comes along with better gear then ill switch stright away.</p><p></p><p>one thing i do know, i wont be doing bars in our inlab system, but it has the software and sirona say its good enough :spit:</p><p>cant get a quality seal on a single coping but bars are great.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paulg100, post: 95781, member: 1643"] "Multiple people say 3shape can produce a bar that fits good enough, from experience. Others, with there own agenda, that hate 3shape, say it cant. So who is right?" 1. you look for independent published research. It can still be manipulated but its generally more accurate than an opinion hidden behind an agenda. And my god theres so much of that when it comes to cad/cam its not true. 2. if theres no INDEPENDENT research, then you see it with your own eyes over several cases. "Anyone have any pictures of a 3shape bar??" some macro images of the marginal seal would be nice, but that still wont show us if there's consistent closed margins or a rock across the span. you really have to get stuck in and see it for yourself i think. been to two major cad/cam companies in the UK that "lots of techs" say put out great fitting frames. Both of the multi unit bridge samples they showed me were rocking! and i assume this was there best effort. one thing i can say.. the bar fits im getting from Biomet 3i have been awesome so far. But then there scanning the models with uber expensive scanners (as they wont accept 3shape/meddit etc) and ultimately its just my opinion of what awesome is (under x15 mag) No agenda or bias, if a company comes along with better gear then ill switch stright away. one thing i do know, i wont be doing bars in our inlab system, but it has the software and sirona say its good enough :spit: cant get a quality seal on a single coping but bars are great. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
My new, new scanner....
Top
Bottom