Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
"Lean" production gypsum models
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gru" data-source="post: 153644" data-attributes="member: 7032"><p><em>Affinity: "Using your second pour for your die scan makes no sense to me. Not to mention that most of the material in the sulcus will get torn off with the first pour. The only step you somewhat eliminate is sectioning the dies, which only takes seconds anyways.. Working on only a solid model with no removable dies sucks.. preps break.. Eliminating stone based pinned models saves loads of time."</em></p><p></p><p>Absolutely correct. The working die should always be the first pour unless there's no choice. But the second pour can be a "solid" articulated model and could work if you are willing to deal with the contact difficulties.</p><p></p><p><em>"Honestly I shouldnt even reply to this thread because I see no way of doing accurate work producing over 600 models a day. I would quit the first week of having to QC hundreds of models that 2-5 techs have already had their hands on. Not saying it cant be done, I just cant imagine it."</em></p><p></p><p>Why does it matter whether it's 6 or 600 models? If the process is tight, the people are good and there are enough of them, then it's simply scale. </p><p>Being in a production line setup would make me want to quit too, but each to their own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gru, post: 153644, member: 7032"] [I]Affinity: "Using your second pour for your die scan makes no sense to me. Not to mention that most of the material in the sulcus will get torn off with the first pour. The only step you somewhat eliminate is sectioning the dies, which only takes seconds anyways.. Working on only a solid model with no removable dies sucks.. preps break.. Eliminating stone based pinned models saves loads of time."[/I] Absolutely correct. The working die should always be the first pour unless there's no choice. But the second pour can be a "solid" articulated model and could work if you are willing to deal with the contact difficulties. [I]"Honestly I shouldnt even reply to this thread because I see no way of doing accurate work producing over 600 models a day. I would quit the first week of having to QC hundreds of models that 2-5 techs have already had their hands on. Not saying it cant be done, I just cant imagine it."[/I] Why does it matter whether it's 6 or 600 models? If the process is tight, the people are good and there are enough of them, then it's simply scale. Being in a production line setup would make me want to quit too, but each to their own. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
"Lean" production gypsum models
Top
Bottom