Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
"Lean" production gypsum models
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jason D" data-source="post: 153595" data-attributes="member: 12217"><p>Of course model free is the leanest/ideal, but working through inconsistencies in technique from one office to another still requires a physical model be fabricated at first, those being printed models usually.</p><p>Layered work naturally requires a physical model.</p><p>We prefer monotrac, same/similar advantages but we like the results better in terms of cleanup and neatness, as well as the versatility to adapt to other articulators without dramatically altering the model workflow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jason D, post: 153595, member: 12217"] Of course model free is the leanest/ideal, but working through inconsistencies in technique from one office to another still requires a physical model be fabricated at first, those being printed models usually. Layered work naturally requires a physical model. We prefer monotrac, same/similar advantages but we like the results better in terms of cleanup and neatness, as well as the versatility to adapt to other articulators without dramatically altering the model workflow. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
"Lean" production gypsum models
Top
Bottom