Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
3D Printer
Lab Analog fitting too tight on 3d printed model
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Contraluz" data-source="post: 313808" data-attributes="member: 3357"><p>Tell me about... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite12" alt="o_O" title="Er... what? o_O" loading="lazy" data-shortname="o_O" /> </p><p></p><p>Since we outsource the model printing, it can get frustrating to find out the model, you just received, doesn't work with the analog. Usually it is too loose, which renders the model useless. Adjust the parameters, send the file again and wait until you get the new model back just to realize, nothing has changed... Then, the whole scan flag chaos, all the different libraries, which need to be updated every so often, all the different dim analogs etc etc. I also think the NT-trading Dim analogs (which a couple companies use as their analogs) are more prone to fail in the printed models. Their interface is too flimsy, I think. </p><p></p><p>In terms of model printing, I found Staumann to work best with our settings. Dim analogs fit tight and nicely. Costs might be on the higher side, but it beats the back and forth with the other companies, which, at the end, costs much more.</p><p></p><p>M</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Contraluz, post: 313808, member: 3357"] Tell me about... o_O Since we outsource the model printing, it can get frustrating to find out the model, you just received, doesn't work with the analog. Usually it is too loose, which renders the model useless. Adjust the parameters, send the file again and wait until you get the new model back just to realize, nothing has changed... Then, the whole scan flag chaos, all the different libraries, which need to be updated every so often, all the different dim analogs etc etc. I also think the NT-trading Dim analogs (which a couple companies use as their analogs) are more prone to fail in the printed models. Their interface is too flimsy, I think. In terms of model printing, I found Staumann to work best with our settings. Dim analogs fit tight and nicely. Costs might be on the higher side, but it beats the back and forth with the other companies, which, at the end, costs much more. M [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
3D Printer
Lab Analog fitting too tight on 3d printed model
Top
Bottom