Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
All Porcelain-Press
Emax Multi ingot
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Matrix" data-source="post: 59732" data-attributes="member: 2346"><p>I back Ivoclar on this. They have patented the process on the Multi including the sprueing procedure. This is all about protecting a proprietary process Icvoclar took the time and expense to develop. </p><p> This is no different than the major drug companies developing a new medication then protecting their intellectual investment with a patent. </p><p> You would not be pressing anything if it had not been for Ivoclar developing the Empress system. They are a world leader in innovation and product development in the dental field. Why tip your hand on anything before you have a chance to cash in on your efforts? </p><p> I was in the trying to press emax camp to with non Ivoclar equipment. Had plenty of problems and spent allot of time and money. I purchased a EP5000 and have had a 100% success rate ever since. Congratulations to those of you who ironed out the problems and are pressing with other brand equipment. </p><p> Look at the quality of the emax pressing photos that one pressing oven manufacture is showing on this very forum. A picture speaks a thousand words. </p><p> This is one of the major reasons the firing parameters are kept secret. As a manufacture would you want that that quality of restoration representing your new product launch? </p><p> Just because it is possible slap a Mercedes hood ornament on a Dodge Neon , does that make it a Benz? The whole process of manufacturing and product development make a Mercedes a Mercedes Benz.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Matrix, post: 59732, member: 2346"] I back Ivoclar on this. They have patented the process on the Multi including the sprueing procedure. This is all about protecting a proprietary process Icvoclar took the time and expense to develop. This is no different than the major drug companies developing a new medication then protecting their intellectual investment with a patent. You would not be pressing anything if it had not been for Ivoclar developing the Empress system. They are a world leader in innovation and product development in the dental field. Why tip your hand on anything before you have a chance to cash in on your efforts? I was in the trying to press emax camp to with non Ivoclar equipment. Had plenty of problems and spent allot of time and money. I purchased a EP5000 and have had a 100% success rate ever since. Congratulations to those of you who ironed out the problems and are pressing with other brand equipment. Look at the quality of the emax pressing photos that one pressing oven manufacture is showing on this very forum. A picture speaks a thousand words. This is one of the major reasons the firing parameters are kept secret. As a manufacture would you want that that quality of restoration representing your new product launch? Just because it is possible slap a Mercedes hood ornament on a Dodge Neon , does that make it a Benz? The whole process of manufacturing and product development make a Mercedes a Mercedes Benz. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
All Porcelain-Press
Emax Multi ingot
Top
Bottom