Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Dose anyone use sum3d with two different brand milling machine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sevan P" data-source="post: 261384" data-attributes="member: 7766"><p>Did this back in 2012 imes 340i and Roland dwx 50. you just need the right post proseser for the mill. Same blanks can be used in both mills as well. But you will most likely need to change the offset or simply set a standard offset like 2.8 or 3.0 cause the imes uses a 2.5mm to trough and the Roland uses a 2mm, so a offset of 2.8 is minimal for a 2.5mm tool so 3mm might be ideal but still big for the Roland. It manageable.</p><p></p><p>Also you will have to figure out if the disk is rotated in the ones from the Roland. If I recall right the disk was flipped or rotated 180° in the holder. Has to do with the position of one of the axis.</p><p></p><p>Best way create a new blank place it in the ones and run a simulation cut with no disk in the mill for a single unit, then run another simulation with another single unit in the Roland and see where the disk needs to be changed and remember and make changes as needed.</p><p></p><p>Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sevan P, post: 261384, member: 7766"] Did this back in 2012 imes 340i and Roland dwx 50. you just need the right post proseser for the mill. Same blanks can be used in both mills as well. But you will most likely need to change the offset or simply set a standard offset like 2.8 or 3.0 cause the imes uses a 2.5mm to trough and the Roland uses a 2mm, so a offset of 2.8 is minimal for a 2.5mm tool so 3mm might be ideal but still big for the Roland. It manageable. Also you will have to figure out if the disk is rotated in the ones from the Roland. If I recall right the disk was flipped or rotated 180° in the holder. Has to do with the position of one of the axis. Best way create a new blank place it in the ones and run a simulation cut with no disk in the mill for a single unit, then run another simulation with another single unit in the Roland and see where the disk needs to be changed and remember and make changes as needed. Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Dose anyone use sum3d with two different brand milling machine?
Top
Bottom