Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Clon3D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CoolHandLuke" data-source="post: 67745" data-attributes="member: 4850"><p>itero to me works quite well. they are a product that has noticeable quality, superior to many 3d systems out there. the fee to design margins really is only beneficial to the in-house laboratory; the model fee i do not see to be too expensive in any way. </p><p></p><p>itero isnt a closed system; labs with the review station can export scans and restoration orders from itero into 3shape, CIL, dental wings, straumann and more.</p><p></p><p>what i like about the itero is more the features of the software, to allow the dentist to look at his scan, analyze it in detail (shape of shoulders, clarity of margins, distance to antagonist) all a mouseclick away. it has helped some of my dentists to be better prep designers, and has made some much better at giving me clear margins.</p><p></p><p>i can't speak to Clon3d directly about their system so i dont know what kind of operational features come with the software.</p><p></p><p>that said, there are two things i don't like about the itero - 1. built in network. if they would let you save to a disk or save to a zip file, or even share patient scans on a website and email out the download links, it would be great and i wouldnt need a dedicated lab review station and the docs wouldnt need extra internet lines. 2. using the mouse. ugh. whoever designed this system should be strung up by the tendons in the palm of his hand, over a pot of boiling boogers taken from illiterate children. this sucks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CoolHandLuke, post: 67745, member: 4850"] itero to me works quite well. they are a product that has noticeable quality, superior to many 3d systems out there. the fee to design margins really is only beneficial to the in-house laboratory; the model fee i do not see to be too expensive in any way. itero isnt a closed system; labs with the review station can export scans and restoration orders from itero into 3shape, CIL, dental wings, straumann and more. what i like about the itero is more the features of the software, to allow the dentist to look at his scan, analyze it in detail (shape of shoulders, clarity of margins, distance to antagonist) all a mouseclick away. it has helped some of my dentists to be better prep designers, and has made some much better at giving me clear margins. i can't speak to Clon3d directly about their system so i dont know what kind of operational features come with the software. that said, there are two things i don't like about the itero - 1. built in network. if they would let you save to a disk or save to a zip file, or even share patient scans on a website and email out the download links, it would be great and i wouldnt need a dedicated lab review station and the docs wouldnt need extra internet lines. 2. using the mouse. ugh. whoever designed this system should be strung up by the tendons in the palm of his hand, over a pot of boiling boogers taken from illiterate children. this sucks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Clon3D
Top
Bottom