Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Ceramill Mikro 5x vs Roland DWX-52D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jesse Zamarripa" data-source="post: 286338" data-attributes="member: 13295"><p>If you get a second roland you should be able to use the same suction now and use the same CAM software which will bring the cost down and minimize training on a new machine. Plus you can use the same tools for your second machine. The mikro requires its own tools and CAM software but it is faster and more sturdy than a roland but it uses it's own CAM software. The Roland may be a better option for you at this point unless you are planning on upgrading to a Motion 2. Thank you </p><p></p><p>Jesse</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jesse Zamarripa, post: 286338, member: 13295"] If you get a second roland you should be able to use the same suction now and use the same CAM software which will bring the cost down and minimize training on a new machine. Plus you can use the same tools for your second machine. The mikro requires its own tools and CAM software but it is faster and more sturdy than a roland but it uses it's own CAM software. The Roland may be a better option for you at this point unless you are planning on upgrading to a Motion 2. Thank you Jesse [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Ceramill Mikro 5x vs Roland DWX-52D
Top
Bottom