Ceramill Mikro 5x vs Roland DWX-52D

tehnik

tehnik

Active Member
Full Member
Ratings
16 2
#1
Hi all!

So what do you think, which one is better for zirconia, wax an PMMA. I currently have Roland DWX-52DC and thinkig about sexond milling machine. I have offer for both systems. Ceramill is more expensive so I want to know is it actually better or its just the name that costs?
 
Jesse Zamarripa

Jesse Zamarripa

Member
Full Member
Ratings
29 2
#2
Hi all!

So what do you think, which one is better for zirconia, wax an PMMA. I currently have Roland DWX-52DC and thinkig about sexond milling machine. I have offer for both systems. Ceramill is more expensive so I want to know is it actually better or its just the name that costs?
If you get a second roland you should be able to use the same suction now and use the same CAM software which will bring the cost down and minimize training on a new machine. Plus you can use the same tools for your second machine. The mikro requires its own tools and CAM software but it is faster and more sturdy than a roland but it uses it's own CAM software. The Roland may be a better option for you at this point unless you are planning on upgrading to a Motion 2. Thank you

Jesse
 
G

grantoz

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Ratings
792 56
#3
roland ,as it has sexond .who wouldnt want sexond in their milling options. can i say sexond again please.but i would get the roland anyway im not that shallow .
 
Guest Room
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Chat Bot:
    Room has been pruned!
    Chat Bot: Room has been pruned!