Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Amann Girrbach Ceramill motion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pingvin" data-source="post: 43796" data-attributes="member: 3134"><p>I don't understand why everyone is omitting Zirkonzahn. Doesn't anyone uses thoem? (I am not, but I am considering it for the next year). They introduced manual milling of zirkonia, and Girbach copied it. Then Zirkonzahn introduced low-cost scan-mill system and Girbach went the same route again.</p><p></p><p>Also, about the scanner, Girbach has 2 scaners, both with resolution 20 microns, while Zirkonzahn's scanner resolution is <10 micrones. ZZ milling unit has 5 axis, Girbach 4 axis.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pingvin, post: 43796, member: 3134"] I don't understand why everyone is omitting Zirkonzahn. Doesn't anyone uses thoem? (I am not, but I am considering it for the next year). They introduced manual milling of zirkonia, and Girbach copied it. Then Zirkonzahn introduced low-cost scan-mill system and Girbach went the same route again. Also, about the scanner, Girbach has 2 scaners, both with resolution 20 microns, while Zirkonzahn's scanner resolution is <10 micrones. ZZ milling unit has 5 axis, Girbach 4 axis. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Amann Girrbach Ceramill motion
Top
Bottom