Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Equipment
VHF CAM 5-S1 Impression Vs Roland DWX-50
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="taki" data-source="post: 130093" data-attributes="member: 3621"><p>I don't know why these 2 companies choosed Roland, i know that i can clearly state which CNC controller the VHFs utilize (can you inform us which one the Rolands utilize?) and i definetly know that there are many well respected companies that adopted VHFs in their CAD/CAM product lines with different names and housings, like the followings:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.wieland-dental.de/en/products/zenotec/milling-machines/" target="_blank">http://www.wieland-dental.de/en/products/zenotec/milling-machines/ </a></p><p><a href="http://www.schuetz-dental.de/tl_files/content/epapers/2013/en_tizian/index.html#/4" target="_blank">http://www.schuetz-dental.de/tl_files/content/epapers/2013/en_tizian/index.html#/4</a></p><p><a href="http://www.zfx-dental.com/en/zfx-mill-inhouse" target="_blank">http://www.zfx-dental.com/en/zfx-mill-inhouse</a></p><p><a href="http://www.fino.com/index.php?id=43&L=1" target="_blank">http://www.fino.com/index.php?id=43&L=1</a></p><p><a href="http://goldquadrat.de/Website/index.php?id=631" target="_blank">http://goldquadrat.de/Website/index.php?id=631</a></p><p><a href="http://www.glidewelldental.com/lab/cad-cam-systems/index.aspx?Header=0" target="_blank">http://www.glidewelldental.com/lab/cad-cam-systems/index.aspx?Header=0</a></p><p><a href="https://www.shera.de/en/silver.econtent/catalog/Shera/SHERAdigital/Geraete/Fraesgeraete" target="_blank">https://www.shera.de/en/silver.econtent/catalog/Shera/SHERAdigital/Geraete/Fraesgeraete</a></p><p>and others as well.....</p><p></p><p>And at the end of the day VHFs can <strong>dry mill</strong> metal (CrCo) plus (in S series) the <strong>wet grinding </strong>of Lithium Disilicate (e-max) blocks and other materials which <u>need cooling</u> as well (and Vita, Dentsply, Ivoclar etc come out with a lot of such materials in blocks),something that Rolands <u>can't do</u>!</p><p>No offense but although Roland DWX-50 (and only this) is a good machine and does well what it does it cannot be compared with VHF's S series, it's just not fair for Roland. It does not offer the wider range of materials and indications that a VHF S series does and does it perfectly, with a proven long life span and return of investment!</p><p><a href="http://www.vhf.eu/en/Machines/BasicSystems/ImpressionDental" target="_blank">http://www.vhf.eu/en/Machines/BasicSystems/ImpressionDental </a></p><p><a href="http://www.vhf.eu/en/Machines/BasicSystems/ImpressionDental" target="_blank"><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="taki, post: 130093, member: 3621"] I don't know why these 2 companies choosed Roland, i know that i can clearly state which CNC controller the VHFs utilize (can you inform us which one the Rolands utilize?) and i definetly know that there are many well respected companies that adopted VHFs in their CAD/CAM product lines with different names and housings, like the followings: [URL='http://www.wieland-dental.de/en/products/zenotec/milling-machines/']http://www.wieland-dental.de/en/products/zenotec/milling-machines/ [/URL] [url]http://www.schuetz-dental.de/tl_files/content/epapers/2013/en_tizian/index.html#/4[/url] [url]http://www.zfx-dental.com/en/zfx-mill-inhouse[/url] [url]http://www.fino.com/index.php?id=43&L=1[/url] [url]http://goldquadrat.de/Website/index.php?id=631[/url] [url]http://www.glidewelldental.com/lab/cad-cam-systems/index.aspx?Header=0[/url] [url]https://www.shera.de/en/silver.econtent/catalog/Shera/SHERAdigital/Geraete/Fraesgeraete[/url] and others as well..... And at the end of the day VHFs can [B]dry mill[/B] metal (CrCo) plus (in S series) the [B]wet grinding [/B]of Lithium Disilicate (e-max) blocks and other materials which [U]need cooling[/U] as well (and Vita, Dentsply, Ivoclar etc come out with a lot of such materials in blocks),something that Rolands [U]can't do[/U]! No offense but although Roland DWX-50 (and only this) is a good machine and does well what it does it cannot be compared with VHF's S series, it's just not fair for Roland. It does not offer the wider range of materials and indications that a VHF S series does and does it perfectly, with a proven long life span and return of investment! [URL='http://www.vhf.eu/en/Machines/BasicSystems/ImpressionDental']http://www.vhf.eu/en/Machines/BasicSystems/ImpressionDental ;)[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Equipment
VHF CAM 5-S1 Impression Vs Roland DWX-50
Top
Bottom