D
dumbdentist
Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
Would love some advice.
We have a patient that is in a MUA situation. 6 implants.
35 y/o female. Petite. Implants were placed with the decision to NOT reduce 10 mm of bone to hide the transition line. I agree with the decision. This is not to discuss the surgery, this is more to discuss the prosth part. . There will be a transition line, as the restoration will be an FP1. My thoughts are:
1) just a plain old zirc restoration. higher chance of breaking/fracturing in the future. All digital now so if it does break the cloud can just poop out a new arch.
2) milled titanium with porcelain laid on top. repairs can be done in the future. lots of labour.
3) casted metal with porcelain laid on top. repairs can be done in the future. lots of labour
4) milled titanium with thimble individual crowns. lots of labour.
5) casted metal with thimble individual crowns. lots of labour.
would love some opinions... any experiences you may have??
thanks
Quote Reply
Report Edit
We have a patient that is in a MUA situation. 6 implants.
35 y/o female. Petite. Implants were placed with the decision to NOT reduce 10 mm of bone to hide the transition line. I agree with the decision. This is not to discuss the surgery, this is more to discuss the prosth part. . There will be a transition line, as the restoration will be an FP1. My thoughts are:
1) just a plain old zirc restoration. higher chance of breaking/fracturing in the future. All digital now so if it does break the cloud can just poop out a new arch.
2) milled titanium with porcelain laid on top. repairs can be done in the future. lots of labour.
3) casted metal with porcelain laid on top. repairs can be done in the future. lots of labour
4) milled titanium with thimble individual crowns. lots of labour.
5) casted metal with thimble individual crowns. lots of labour.
would love some opinions... any experiences you may have??
thanks
Quote Reply
Report Edit