John, I understand some of your points of view, but rest assured, im not the guy that "coasts thru" anything.
My skillset has included large cases, but yes, definitely has room to grow. that said, I see "poor work" in every avenue on the Central Coast. Work that is in "no wayY" comparable to what we can generate as "standard".
As long as trained techs keep leaving the industry, and are replaced by Pizza Hut drivers, im pretty sure I'll do just fine. schools have closed, so who is my replacement when the collective local dental IQ has dropped to that of a field mouse?
locally, all I see are clowns climbing all over each other to get "larger cases" so they can boost their ego's, and think they've done something special, financially out-racing each other to the bottom. this was my point.
Our business model is a 2 person lab that doesn't need to rake in cases to pay for building rent and a bunch of employees that are capable of one or two tasks, which in turn need to support a bunch of "non" producers... I could go on, and on.
I already am an expert at what I do John. im damn good at it, and ill always get better at what im good at... so is my wife, a removable tech.
but this doesn't mean I should be an "expert" in "everything". its been my experience that experts at everything usually don't know half of anything.
our intention is to service a handful of accounts, and move in the direction/s that fit their needs as well as ours. Im not flexible, im fluid.
our business "growth" will happen when I can purchase equipment and limit my manufacturing outsourcing, NOT by hiring employees and then chasing work to support payroll for said employees. I already know what I alone can produce daily, and im pretty happy with the projected numbers, even on the lower end of my expectations. add in my wife and maybe an admin employee on top of that? this is the exact position We should be in.
that said, could you please expand on
take a minute and really contemplate how technology will limit your viability in the near future
technology hasn't been used to the "fullest extent" in any lab I've ever worked in, so how will technology limit "our" viability? my intention is to "master" our software and new manufacturing tools as I can acquire them..
ive made some pretty big changes/leaps forward in that regard, despite my apprehension to "learn new tricks"... the cog in the wheel is me, so im quite sure I'll be up till 2am again with model creator module that we purchased a few days ago. fk it. i love it regardless of the hours ive got to spend, but here's the thing.. just because we bought the implant module, doesn't mean I'm going to run around looking for implant work? why, when 3 crowns is just as lucrative and takes the same amount of time.
this industry has shifted from "Full Technicians" in the lab at the bench to 1 Technician and a bunch of people who "call" themselves technicians.
how many technicians do you currently have that can take a case from start to finish themselves? there is a Massive void between digital and analog that isn't bridged unless there is a technician that understands both digital and analog, and can take both to the bench. look at your outsourced designs as a symptom, not a cure. this is the point where viability is limited "with" technology. not the other way around.
also, not sure "how" you are referring to on quadrant vs comprehensive and how that falls into what ive previously posted.
Lab manager I had, and have great respect for. his business motto was "keep your overhead down and work your ass off".
Solar has already been installed, so I guess I better get back to the second statement in his Motto.