Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Looking for objective input.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dali k" data-source="post: 247934" data-attributes="member: 12559"><p>Forget about dental wings,,, 3shape and exocad are the new players,,, there are a lot of stuff you can't do with dental wings. plus its harder to give the shape you want... you dont have the same feeling when you'r designing and you end up having pumpkin lines in your designs. In 3shape you have a much better feeling when you design you can really get the right shapes very fast. for copings and single molars DW is good enough but for more then that its far behind.If you are still building porcelaine on copings DW is ok. But for monolithics, monolithics with cutbacks, emax etc 3shape is much better. </p><p>there are a lot of examples of features you have on 3shape you dont have in DW.</p><p>One of my favorite is the proximal contact adjustments taking in consideration the insertion axis.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dali k, post: 247934, member: 12559"] Forget about dental wings,,, 3shape and exocad are the new players,,, there are a lot of stuff you can't do with dental wings. plus its harder to give the shape you want... you dont have the same feeling when you'r designing and you end up having pumpkin lines in your designs. In 3shape you have a much better feeling when you design you can really get the right shapes very fast. for copings and single molars DW is good enough but for more then that its far behind.If you are still building porcelaine on copings DW is ok. But for monolithics, monolithics with cutbacks, emax etc 3shape is much better. there are a lot of examples of features you have on 3shape you dont have in DW. One of my favorite is the proximal contact adjustments taking in consideration the insertion axis. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Looking for objective input.
Top
Bottom