My preliminary opinion, for what it's worth and I am a competitor, so there ya go.
Now I am not saying it is not a good machine. I'm just saying that I am not sure I would call this a total beast just yet—not without knowing any specs on the real important aspects of the machine. Nothing on frame construction, weight, guide system, screw diameters, preload, reduction gearing, fixturing, coolant delivery, etc., etc.
Can't really tell but it looks like a lot of "wrapping paper" which may make it "look" nice, but provides no significant weight to provide all important vibration dampening or heat dissipation.
Although from looking at the video, its certainly not a "toaster". Fixturing lacks optimum support (more vibration),some beefy components, but that's about all I can tell. Not seen any specs or gut-shots to take a peek for a clue.
CAM software and templates are also key and should also be high on the decision criteria list. Having been in the CAD/CAM software business for many years, home-grown high-speed, 5-axis, CAM software on uber-tight tolerance STL files? Scary. Lots of risk. No thanks, tried that, never want to see the T-shirt again.
Spindle power seems a bit light— but torque at operating speed is the real issue (which is also not published) but depending on whether or not it has an AC sync or DC motor, under 1kW power would might not yield as much power as you think (especially if that rating is max and not S1). Other considerations important to evaluation, performance, longevity and restoration quality; bearing type and configuration, runout, cooling, manufacturer and more.
Who knows, it may turn out to be one, but to me, the jury is still out on this, what appears to be an entirely new machine design, waaay out.
Just say'n...
Now here is a REAL beast. Check out the
specs.
View attachment 29238