Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Dentallabnetwork.com
Dental News
Exposure to heavy metals may increase risk of autism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JMN" data-source="post: 254715" data-attributes="member: 8469"><p>I have no issue with facts. Just interpretations.</p><p>Various theories of the mechanisms, including one just Adjudicated correct (</p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/government-concedes-vacci_b_88323.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/government-concedes-vacci_b_88323.html</a> )</p><p>have been proposed. But because of all the people certain it isn't so, the science is not getting done to find the facts.</p><p></p><p>I agree that science always wins. But true science begins with the questions. Not the answers.</p><p>Confirmation bias is always a possiblility in any research. However, actually seeing if something is a fact by rigorous, plodding, enervatingly long investagative steps before assuming it is a fact works pretty much better than skipping a few steps because we think we already know the answers.</p><p></p><p>Again, I am not a no-vaccine crusader. I know of the ability of science to show, and prove, facts. But if 'Science' as an institution is so terribly certain of something that has not been, or will not be tested and investigated, it is not a scientific response that will be provided. Rather simply a human response from someone who has scientific credentials enough to know better.</p><p></p><p>Totally not trying to bust your chops. Just wanting to engage in a genial, lively, deliberation of seemingly differing views. I do have respect for you and your view, I just don't understand why people insist something without proof, and I guess I'm hoping to understand that better by getting to know you better.</p><p></p><p>Real sorry about your friend. Seriously.</p><p></p><p>Something you may find interesting. There were initially 3 'types' of polio vaccine. One of them killed nearly very person to whom it was given. If you are curious about that story, a book called ''Dr. Mary's Monkey'' will tell you about it and other related things. Things, some of which, have been removed from the hiaography of the events. Even though they are also scientifically provable fact.</p><p></p><p>Funny world.</p><p></p><p>Oh. Not really any point here, but I do have a nephew with an Autism Spectrum diagnosis. And he's AWESOME! If you ever want to know something about steam trains, let me know, I'll ask him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JMN, post: 254715, member: 8469"] I have no issue with facts. Just interpretations. Various theories of the mechanisms, including one just Adjudicated correct ( [URL]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/government-concedes-vacci_b_88323.html[/URL] ) have been proposed. But because of all the people certain it isn't so, the science is not getting done to find the facts. I agree that science always wins. But true science begins with the questions. Not the answers. Confirmation bias is always a possiblility in any research. However, actually seeing if something is a fact by rigorous, plodding, enervatingly long investagative steps before assuming it is a fact works pretty much better than skipping a few steps because we think we already know the answers. Again, I am not a no-vaccine crusader. I know of the ability of science to show, and prove, facts. But if 'Science' as an institution is so terribly certain of something that has not been, or will not be tested and investigated, it is not a scientific response that will be provided. Rather simply a human response from someone who has scientific credentials enough to know better. Totally not trying to bust your chops. Just wanting to engage in a genial, lively, deliberation of seemingly differing views. I do have respect for you and your view, I just don't understand why people insist something without proof, and I guess I'm hoping to understand that better by getting to know you better. Real sorry about your friend. Seriously. Something you may find interesting. There were initially 3 'types' of polio vaccine. One of them killed nearly very person to whom it was given. If you are curious about that story, a book called ''Dr. Mary's Monkey'' will tell you about it and other related things. Things, some of which, have been removed from the hiaography of the events. Even though they are also scientifically provable fact. Funny world. Oh. Not really any point here, but I do have a nephew with an Autism Spectrum diagnosis. And he's AWESOME! If you ever want to know something about steam trains, let me know, I'll ask him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Dentallabnetwork.com
Dental News
Exposure to heavy metals may increase risk of autism
Top
Bottom