Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
All Porcelain-Press
Emax-Press v cad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NicelyMKV" data-source="post: 78222" data-attributes="member: 476"><p>My problem was the quality of margin I get often on cases. A lot of up and down. I had some slight issues with marginal fit via cad compared to pressed. We mill wax posteriors and press. I felt like I got slightly better occlusal anatomy and fits due to the way wax can be milled compares to Emax CAD. I assumed the numbers were better milling wax and pressing compared to milling cad? Im asking not stating. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Jason</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NicelyMKV, post: 78222, member: 476"] My problem was the quality of margin I get often on cases. A lot of up and down. I had some slight issues with marginal fit via cad compared to pressed. We mill wax posteriors and press. I felt like I got slightly better occlusal anatomy and fits due to the way wax can be milled compares to Emax CAD. I assumed the numbers were better milling wax and pressing compared to milling cad? Im asking not stating. :) Jason [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
All Porcelain-Press
Emax-Press v cad
Top
Bottom