Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community discussion
Case Presentations
Intra-Oral and Dental Photography
Dental photography
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wwcanoer" data-source="post: 9433" data-attributes="member: 706"><p><img src="http://[IMG]http://dentallabnetwork.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=12&pictureid=55" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />[/IMG]</p><p></p><p>These photos are what have me curious regarding photography. This first photo of a MOD prepped number five, with A3.5 shade tab, looks like a great match for the incisal third. The pressed restoration, staining technique, looks like a good match as shown in the next two photos. Unfortunately, when tried in, it looked incredibly opaque (sorry no photo),and ended up redoing it with Bellglass.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://dentallabnetwork.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=12&pictureid=53" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://[IMG]http://dentallabnetwork.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=12&pictureid=55" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />[/IMG]</p><p></p><p><img src="http://dentallabnetwork.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=12&pictureid=54" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>I have done other MOD restorations using both Jenson's Authentic and Ivoclar's Esthetic and 90% of the time have great results. I guess what this boils down to, is I feel like I'm missing something regarding the interpretation of the photos. And that leads me back to my original question regarding my monitor.....</p><p></p><p>Carol</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wwcanoer, post: 9433, member: 706"] [IMG]http://[IMG]http://dentallabnetwork.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=12&pictureid=55[/IMG][/IMG] These photos are what have me curious regarding photography. This first photo of a MOD prepped number five, with A3.5 shade tab, looks like a great match for the incisal third. The pressed restoration, staining technique, looks like a good match as shown in the next two photos. Unfortunately, when tried in, it looked incredibly opaque (sorry no photo),and ended up redoing it with Bellglass. [IMG]http://dentallabnetwork.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=12&pictureid=53[/IMG] [IMG][IMG]http://dentallabnetwork.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=12&pictureid=55[/IMG][/IMG] [IMG]http://dentallabnetwork.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=12&pictureid=54[/IMG] I have done other MOD restorations using both Jenson's Authentic and Ivoclar's Esthetic and 90% of the time have great results. I guess what this boils down to, is I feel like I'm missing something regarding the interpretation of the photos. And that leads me back to my original question regarding my monitor..... Carol [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Community discussion
Case Presentations
Intra-Oral and Dental Photography
Dental photography
Top
Bottom