- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 1
I think you are right John.
It was harder than I first thought, but we are doing it now all day long and having success.
I have only seen One lab doing it in Ca but never saw any finished products, and heard of a few more. (excluding Glidew3ll).
I think we are going to buy another Metal mill before the Summer hits. It's fun and profitable, but very technical and challanging.
Mark my words the biggest players in this industry are not the ones that will eventually be visited by FDA.
The quote you posted in the other thread has been around for a while but truthfully when I first entertained milling interfaces I did contact FDA and the FEES to become compliant were stagering. I found it to be a quite daunting task, and gave up with the notion for now.
Like any other regulatory system in place its only as important as the enforcement. Like many things in this life if the feds don't see it as important it will only become important and enforceable when the people with money in this industry lobby for it to control the competition.
Just some musing I have on the topic.
Interesting post John.
Its amazing to me that there is no definitive answer on the FDA approval issue relative to abutments.
I looked into getting FDA 510(k) approval for pre-milled ti abutment blanks last year before we decided to go with the NT-Trading blanks which have FDA clearance.
It was going to cost somewhere around $40K to work with a respected international consultant I know and go through the process.
The word going around at the time was that milling centers producing custom abutments were going to have to have FDA approval for their process as well as using FDA approved blanks.
I asked the consultant if he had heard about the requirement and he said not and would be surprised if it was the case.
He have me the telephone number for a gentleman he know in the FDA who was in this area and said I should call him.
Well I did, and surprisingly enough he picked up the phone and I had a fairly lengthy conversation with him. He adamantly said that was not the case and said the FDA had nothing to do with the process of manufacturing the end abutment just that the blank had to be FDA approved.
Actually he wasn't all that pleasant as I kept asking him, basically the same question as I wanted to make sure we were both clear.
Just relating my experience FWIW...
John.....
You are missing the party buddy!
I think you have had too much recent contact with Mark Jackson, right?
Something rubbed-off onto you too now?
(Chicken)
I can't wait for my second Ti mill to arrive!
Whoops!!
Did not realize I am posting in a vendors thread!!
So sorry! Terrible manors!
What I meant to say is....ah, go buy an axsys mill.
Yeah, thats it.
The fact that a CLASS 2 device is regulated leads me to believe that there is plenty of misinformation on this topic. The fact that the pre-fabbed blanks need to be FDA cleared is very telling.
Still doing my homework.
Share what you know to be true KentThere is a lot of misinformation on this topic.
Share what you know to be true Kent
Hey ***,Hey, do you listen to Howard Stern also???
I love that show, and he often plays that little bit from Curley...."I keep trying to think, but nutin'happens!"
Implant manufacturers have spent all this time jumping through all of the FDA hoops of getting all the R and D done and tons of testing and validations, then there is A LOT to it! Including lots of dollars might I add. The tolerances done by screw machines are much tighter than that of a desktop mill can give you. The engineers have set specific ranges ( +/- 2-3 microns) for the parts to be made and go through a rigorous quality inspection for every part made. Many desktop mills cannot mill out an interface because it falls outside the manufacturer's tolerances. I am just very weary of trying to mill out an interface due to the tight tolerances of an implant because the FDA might show up on the doorstep one day and shut you down or fine you or whatever they can do.