a 'ledge' margin on zirconia frameworks

S

sampson

Member
Full Member
Messages
143
Reaction score
3
i recall seeing a video where it was recommended that a ledge be created on zirconia framework margins -to support the porcelain layered on it. Porcelain now will have resistance to failure from shearing forces as the porcelain is put in a compressive state --. is this a common design used ?
 
rkm rdt

rkm rdt

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
21,449
Reaction score
3,288
Porcelain is always in a compressive state.

The ledge design would have to also apply to metal and emax would it not?

I don't ledge.
 
JMN

JMN

Christian Member
Full Member
Messages
12,205
Reaction score
1,884
i recall seeing a video where it was recommended that a ledge be created on zirconia framework margins -to support the porcelain layered on it. Porcelain now will have resistance to failure from shearing forces as the porcelain is put in a compressive state --. is this a common design used ?
That's still used some, but it was really more because of still adapting to the new (at the time) techniques and bonding requirements between zirc/alumina/etc and layered porc so it wouldn't shear as easy. Chemistry has improved and the safety net is no longer really needed.


Now, if you are really sub-gingival, you may want a collar, or not, but that's a different discussion.
 
Affinity

Affinity

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
6,948
Reaction score
1,062
Porcelain is mechanically bonded, so if you create undercuts, then yes it will be less likely to shear off like glaciers melting into the ocean. Theoretically.
 
S

sampson

Member
Full Member
Messages
143
Reaction score
3
thank you
i figured it was a bit of a safety net and is dependant on each case
 
S

sampson

Member
Full Member
Messages
143
Reaction score
3
That's still used some, but it was really more because of still adapting to the new (at the time) techniques and bonding requirements between zirc/alumina/etc and layered porc so it wouldn't shear as easy. Chemistry has improved and the safety net is no longer really needed.


Now, if you are really sub-gingival, you may want a collar, or not, but that's a different discussion.


thank you ,
is there a common name (apart from ledge) for this type of margin -that a milling lab would know/ understand?
 
JMN

JMN

Christian Member
Full Member
Messages
12,205
Reaction score
1,884
Last edited:
Affinity

Affinity

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
6,948
Reaction score
1,062
Maybe I read this wrong.. if a 'ledge' is a 'zirconia margin' or as some old skoolers call a '2 point' margin, (3 point, being the tooth, the metal, and the porcelain, I guess)


I was describing building up the incisal 1/3 so that the middle third is undercut when looking from occlusal.
 
JMN

JMN

Christian Member
Full Member
Messages
12,205
Reaction score
1,884
Maybe I read this wrong.. if a 'ledge' is a 'zirconia margin' or as some old skoolers call a '2 point' margin, (3 point, being the tooth, the metal, and the porcelain, I guess)


I was describing building up the incisal 1/3 so that the middle third is undercut when looking from occlusal.
Gotcha, i went entirely the other direction. Never had heard of it done that way. Seems like the varying width of porc would introduce more stressDontknow
 
JohnWilson

JohnWilson

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
5,487
Reaction score
1,575
Who the heck is layering zirconia copings today?
 
Juko

Juko

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
337
Reaction score
106
Porcelain is mechanically bonded, so if you create undercuts, then yes it will be less likely to shear off like glaciers melting into the ocean. Theoretically.

I was taught porcelain is a chemical bond.
The opaque chemically bonds to the framework and the porcelain chemically bonds to the opaque.


On the other hand if we were going to apply composite to framework we would then need to utilize some sort of mechanical retention for the opaque to bond to so then the composite could bond to the opaque. Other wise it would shear off.
 
CatamountRob

CatamountRob

Banned Member
Full Member
Messages
7,396
Reaction score
1,531
I was taught porcelain is a chemical bond.
The opaque chemically bonds to the framework and the porcelain chemically bonds to the opaque.

Yes, that is correct, except as I understand it, with zirconia.
 
Juko

Juko

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
337
Reaction score
106
Yes, that is correct, except as I understand it, with zirconia.
I believe with the crystal zirconia it is still chemical bond as the porcelain bonds to the crystal. Same with lithium disilicate, it bonds the the disilicate. Perhaps I'm wrong.
 
CatamountRob

CatamountRob

Banned Member
Full Member
Messages
7,396
Reaction score
1,531
I believe with the crystal zirconia it is still chemical bond as the porcelain bonds to the crystal. Same with lithium disilicate, it bonds the the disilicate. Perhaps I'm wrong.
I don't know, we need an expert.
Ohhhh, @disturbed where are you???
 
2thm8kr

2thm8kr

Beanosavedmysociallife
Full Member
Messages
11,304
Reaction score
2,510
I believe with the crystal zirconia it is still chemical bond as the porcelain bonds to the crystal. Same with lithium disilicate, it bonds the the disilicate. Perhaps I'm wrong.[/QUOTE

I haven't been able to find any credible source of a chemical bond between zirconia and porcelain. All data I have found/read points to mechanical bond only.
The mpa of veneered porcelain to zirconia is the weakest at approximately 90mpa.
 
Affinity

Affinity

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
6,948
Reaction score
1,062
Yes porcelain to metal does have a bond between the metal oxides and the opaque/porcelain.. IF everything is compatible. Porcelain still shrinks and compresses around the metal, creating a mechanical bond, this is why the CTE has to be similar. A chemical bond only has so much 'strength', as you can see by porcelain chipping or even separating from the metal.

If porcelain didnt have a chemical bond to zirconia, or between zirconia/liner/porcelain.. then I dont think doing things like buccal veneers would stick becuase there is less undercut, its just a facing. Ive found that being able to do very very minimal layering gives a better effect and less prone to large amounts fracturing. Having said that, I just got back a emax central that the M corner broke off.. Maybe one of the first ever. It might have had 1mm of porcelain over the incisal edge.:banghead:
 
S

sampson

Member
Full Member
Messages
143
Reaction score
3
For layering porcelain over zirconia - what system do you use?
Im looking at either Shofu vintage zr or GC initial zr -- any suggestions?
 
Top Bottom