Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
3shape and high occlusion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Car 54" data-source="post: 257806" data-attributes="member: 85"><p>Maybe it's just me, but I've found 2016 to be more accurate? Or, that I am consistently get better results w/o</p><p>using rubber bands and by equilibrating the casts pre -scan, then sticky waxing the casts together,</p><p>one spot towards the labial anterior and one spot towards the lingual posterior (when scanning the bite).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Car 54, post: 257806, member: 85"] Maybe it's just me, but I've found 2016 to be more accurate? Or, that I am consistently get better results w/o using rubber bands and by equilibrating the casts pre -scan, then sticky waxing the casts together, one spot towards the labial anterior and one spot towards the lingual posterior (when scanning the bite). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
3shape and high occlusion
Top
Bottom