Really??????? That would be GREAT!!!!!! I'll PM today.. let me say that I already know about Essential by LAVA, to my opinion is the same as LAVA and I'll quote someone else's opinion about it because it is exactly how I feel...
[QUOTE]"So, 3M introduces their long anticipated entry into the low-cost zirconia market with something they are calling Essential. From everything I’ve heard, the only thing its essential to is the health of Lava Milling Centers’ bottom lines. I’ve talked to several 3M ALMC’s who have experienced a brutal downturn in their business as more and more competition drives zirconia copings to the brink of commodification.
In my opinion, 3M had two options – 1) Lower the cost of the original Lava material, or 2) come to the market with lower cost product differentiated by lesser attributes. They chose Door #2, and I’m not sure its a good idea.
What are they telling the market? Is 900 MPa flexural strength “good enough”? If so, why would a dentist choose Lava for the single crown or 3-unit bridge applications Essential is supposedly geared toward. Why not use a product like our SDL Origin-AL Z which has a significantly higher flexural strength (1400 MPa),not to mention its availability in 16 Vita Classic FrameShades and 5 3D Vita FrameShades (versus 8 for Lava)?
Did I mention that I heard Essential takes up to 10 minutes longer to mill vs. Lava? And, only comes in 40mm blocks?That should make those ALMC’s really happy… "
Jeff Saylors[/QUOTE]