Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Upgrading Scan PC - HP z240 - 3Shape
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TanMan" data-source="post: 313212" data-attributes="member: 10597"><p>So... I have been able to get everything up and running, unfortunately, there was a delay in one of the parts, but I substituted in a GTX1660Ti for the meanwhile. Results were quite interesting, running 3shape's own benchmark. I went from an i7-7700k@4.2, to an i9-9900@3.6 to i9-9900 (slight OC)</p><p></p><p>OS Hard Drive matters a LOT for the HD Write time. Changing to a high performance NVMe drove the HD Write time down 75%.</p><p>Interestingly enough, there was a 19% increase in Stream Load time. Looking at the results from the i9 (stock),v. i9 (slight OC),the stream load time decreased with the OC. This would lead me to believe that there's a correlation with CPU single core clock speed and stream load time.</p><p>Now, the most important benchmark for me is the post-process time. I believe that this is due to change in graphics card. This leads me to believe that the software is not optimized for workstation graphics cards, although the one provided was a paltry M2000, the replacement is a midtier consumer card. I will know for sure when the 2080Ti comes in and check the benchmarks. I did my own full arch IO scan and found that the real world post-processing was definitely a lot faster even with the 1660Ti.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I'll keep you guys posted with the final results. Hopefully this gives you guys some insight into the software. Worst case scenario, if I cannot improve the stream load time, I might try switching the cpu back to the i7-7700k.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TanMan, post: 313212, member: 10597"] So... I have been able to get everything up and running, unfortunately, there was a delay in one of the parts, but I substituted in a GTX1660Ti for the meanwhile. Results were quite interesting, running 3shape's own benchmark. I went from an i7-7700k@4.2, to an i9-9900@3.6 to i9-9900 (slight OC) OS Hard Drive matters a LOT for the HD Write time. Changing to a high performance NVMe drove the HD Write time down 75%. Interestingly enough, there was a 19% increase in Stream Load time. Looking at the results from the i9 (stock),v. i9 (slight OC),the stream load time decreased with the OC. This would lead me to believe that there's a correlation with CPU single core clock speed and stream load time. Now, the most important benchmark for me is the post-process time. I believe that this is due to change in graphics card. This leads me to believe that the software is not optimized for workstation graphics cards, although the one provided was a paltry M2000, the replacement is a midtier consumer card. I will know for sure when the 2080Ti comes in and check the benchmarks. I did my own full arch IO scan and found that the real world post-processing was definitely a lot faster even with the 1660Ti. Anyway, I'll keep you guys posted with the final results. Hopefully this gives you guys some insight into the software. Worst case scenario, if I cannot improve the stream load time, I might try switching the cpu back to the i7-7700k. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Upgrading Scan PC - HP z240 - 3Shape
Top
Bottom