Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
3D Printer
Stratasys J5 DentaJet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tuyere" data-source="post: 371073" data-attributes="member: 26916"><p>We've had pretty lousy experiences with Stratasys and aren't likely to get back into polyjet printing any time soon, but I do have to admit that the radial build platform approach on the J5 is very neat. Does it impose any weird conditions or limitations? Like, does the effective resolution vary from the inner to outer build area edges? What kind of neat things can you do with the multi-material aspect that you can't do on a standard resin printer? I know about the anatomical model aspect, which is pretty cool by itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tuyere, post: 371073, member: 26916"] We've had pretty lousy experiences with Stratasys and aren't likely to get back into polyjet printing any time soon, but I do have to admit that the radial build platform approach on the J5 is very neat. Does it impose any weird conditions or limitations? Like, does the effective resolution vary from the inner to outer build area edges? What kind of neat things can you do with the multi-material aspect that you can't do on a standard resin printer? I know about the anatomical model aspect, which is pretty cool by itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
3D Printer
Stratasys J5 DentaJet
Top
Bottom